PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EQH vs. CSL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

EQH vs. CSL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Equitable Holdings, Inc. (EQH) and Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQH achieves a -6.30% return, which is significantly lower than CSL's 8.12% return.


EQH

1D
0.94%
1M
4.14%
YTD
-6.30%
6M
-7.48%
1Y
-12.50%
3Y*
20.47%
5Y*
9.89%
10Y*

CSL

1D
0.82%
1M
4.26%
YTD
8.12%
6M
4.47%
1Y
-2.49%
3Y*
14.36%
5Y*
13.87%
10Y*
14.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EQH vs. CSL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
EQH
Equitable Holdings, Inc.
-6.30%3.17%45.04%19.63%-10.17%31.00%6.52%53.13%-14.75%
CSL
Carlisle Companies Incorporated
8.12%-12.26%19.14%34.26%-4.08%60.64%-1.96%63.10%-4.15%

Correlation

The correlation between EQH and CSL is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 10, 2018

0.53

The correlation between EQH and CSL shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.53 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

EPS

EQH:

-$3.67

CSL:

$17.08

PS Ratio

EQH:

0.87

CSL:

2.93

Total Revenue (TTM)

EQH:

$11.32B

CSL:

$4.98B

Gross Profit (TTM)

EQH:

$6.96B

CSL:

$1.41B

EBITDA (TTM)

EQH:

-$759.00M

CSL:

$1.17B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EQH vs. CSL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQH
EQH Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
EQH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EQH Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
EQH Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
EQH Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
EQH Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

CSL
CSL Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
CSL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CSL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
CSL Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
CSL Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
CSL Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQH vs. CSL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Equitable Holdings, Inc. (EQH) and Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EQHCSLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.01

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.42

-0.16

-0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.82

-0.27

-0.55

EQH vs. CSL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQH Sharpe Ratio is -0.47, which is lower than the CSL Sharpe Ratio of -0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQH and CSL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EQH vs. CSL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQH drawdown since its inception was -61.33%, smaller than the maximum CSL drawdown of -64.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQH and CSL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EQHCSLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.33%

-64.56%

+3.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.85%

-31.67%

-4.18%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-35.85%

-37.72%

+1.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.85%

-37.72%

+1.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.51%

-27.08%

+7.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.12%

-12.32%

+0.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.23%

18.90%

-0.67%

Volatility

EQH vs. CSL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Equitable Holdings, Inc. (EQH) is 9.41%, while Carlisle Companies Incorporated (CSL) has a volatility of 10.87%. This indicates that EQH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CSL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EQHCSLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.41%

10.87%

-1.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.38%

24.85%

+0.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.86%

36.22%

-4.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.05%

30.81%

+2.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.75%

29.68%

+9.07%

Dividends

EQH vs. CSL - Dividend Comparison

EQH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.52%, more than CSL's 1.28% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CSL
Carlisle Companies Incorporated
1.28%1.31%1.00%1.02%1.09%0.86%1.31%1.11%1.53%1.27%1.18%1.24%
EQH
Equitable Holdings, Inc.
2.52%2.20%1.99%2.58%2.72%2.17%2.58%2.34%1.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

EQH vs. CSL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Equitable Holdings, Inc. and Carlisle Companies Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20222023202420252026
4.23B
1.05B
(EQH) Total Revenue
(CSL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

EQH vs. CSL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Equitable Holdings, Inc. and Carlisle Companies Incorporated over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-40.0%-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
85.2%
0
Portfolio components
EQH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Equitable Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 3.61B and revenue of 4.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 85.2%.

CSL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carlisle Companies Incorporated reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 1.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.

EQH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Equitable Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 0.00 and revenue of 4.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 0.0%.

CSL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carlisle Companies Incorporated reported an operating income of 180.30M and revenue of 1.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 17.1%.

EQH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Equitable Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 621.00M and revenue of 4.23B, resulting in a net margin of 14.7%.

CSL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Carlisle Companies Incorporated reported a net income of 127.70M and revenue of 1.05B, resulting in a net margin of 12.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


EQH and CSL have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CSL has higher volatility (10.87%) compared to EQH (9.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EQH dropped -61.33% vs CSL's -64.56%.

CSL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.14 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EQH and CSL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer