EQH vs. PFG

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Equitable Holdings, Inc. (EQH) and Principal Financial Group, Inc. (PFG).

Performance

EQH vs. PFG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Equitable Holdings, Inc. (EQH) and Principal Financial Group, Inc. (PFG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

EQH vs. PFG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
EQH Equitable Holdings, Inc.	-20.50%	3.17%	45.04%	19.63%	-10.17%	31.00%	6.52%	53.13%	-17.22%
PFG Principal Financial Group, Inc.	3.04%	18.38%	1.87%	-2.83%	20.10%	51.35%	-5.19%	29.71%	-22.54%

Fundamentals

EPS EQH : -$6.83 PFG : $5.26
PS Ratio EQH : 0.65 PFG : 1.84
Total Revenue (TTM) EQH : $11.67B PFG : $11.05B
Gross Profit (TTM) EQH : $9.23B PFG : $4.91B
EBITDA (TTM) EQH : -$708.00M PFG : $780.40M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQH achieves a -20.50% return, which is significantly lower than PFG's 3.04% return.

EQH

• 1D: 1.37%
• 1M: -6.45%
• YTD: -20.50%
• 6M: -22.67%
• 1Y: -26.36%
• 3Y*: 16.92%
• 5Y*: 5.24%
• 10Y*: —

PFG

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: -5.15%
• YTD: 3.04%
• 6M: 10.49%
• 1Y: 9.88%
• 3Y*: 10.55%
• 5Y*: 12.12%
• 10Y*: 12.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

EQH vs. PFG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQH

EQH Risk / Return Rank: 11
EQH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
EQH Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
EQH Omega Ratio Rank: 13
EQH Calmar Ratio Rank: 15
EQH Martin Ratio Rank: 4

PFG

PFG Risk / Return Rank: 51
PFG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
PFG Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
PFG Omega Ratio Rank: 46
PFG Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
PFG Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQH vs. PFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Equitable Holdings, Inc. (EQH) and Principal Financial Group, Inc. (PFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EQH	PFG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.72	0.35	-1.07
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.85	0.66	-1.51
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.89	1.09	-0.20
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.73	0.56	-1.29
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.74	1.50	-3.24
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EQH vs. PFG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQH Sharpe Ratio is -0.72, which is lower than the PFG Sharpe Ratio of 0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQH and PFG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EQH	PFG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.72	0.35	-1.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.16	0.46	-0.30
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.39	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.28	0.21	+0.07

Correlation

The correlation between EQH and PFG is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

EQH vs. PFG - Dividend Comparison

EQH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.87%, less than PFG's 3.47% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EQH Equitable Holdings, Inc.	2.87%	2.20%	1.99%	2.58%	2.72%	2.17%	2.58%	2.34%	1.56%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PFG Principal Financial Group, Inc.	3.47%	3.49%	3.68%	3.30%	3.05%	3.37%	4.52%	3.96%	4.75%	2.65%	2.78%	3.33%

Drawdowns

EQH vs. PFG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQH drawdown since its inception was -61.33%, smaller than the maximum PFG drawdown of -91.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQH and PFG.

Drawdown Indicators

	EQH	PFG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.33%	-91.50%	+30.17%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-35.85%	-19.29%	-16.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.85%	-29.32%	-6.53%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-64.73%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-31.71%	-6.78%	-24.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.80%	-22.01%	+10.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.98%	7.28%	+7.70%

Volatility

EQH vs. PFG - Volatility Comparison

Equitable Holdings, Inc. (EQH) has a higher volatility of 12.22% compared to Principal Financial Group, Inc. (PFG) at 6.06%. This indicates that EQH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EQH	PFG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.22%	6.06%	+6.16%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.40%	16.62%	+7.78%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.79%	28.62%	+8.17%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.67%	26.68%	+5.99%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	38.84%	32.02%	+6.82%

Financials