EQAL vs. IMCB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EQAL (Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF) and IMCB (iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - EQAL tracks the Russell 1000 Equal Weight Index while IMCB tracks the IMCB-US - Morningstar U.S. Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EQAL returned 10.66%/yr vs 11.32%/yr for IMCB. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EQAL charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for IMCB.

Performance

EQAL vs. IMCB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF (EQAL) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EQAL achieves a 12.35% return, which is significantly lower than IMCB's 14.72% return. Over the past 10 years, EQAL has underperformed IMCB with an annualized return of 10.66%, while IMCB has yielded a comparatively higher 11.32% annualized return.

EQAL

• 1D: -0.73%
• 1M: 1.77%
• YTD: 12.35%
• 6M: 12.78%
• 1Y: 24.33%
• 3Y*: 15.37%
• 5Y*: 6.86%
• 10Y*: 10.66%

IMCB

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 5.22%
• YTD: 14.72%
• 6M: 14.61%
• 1Y: 23.24%
• 3Y*: 17.84%
• 5Y*: 8.81%
• 10Y*: 11.32%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EQAL vs. IMCB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EQAL Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF	12.35%	11.05%	11.38%	11.98%	-13.49%	23.14%	16.57%	24.54%	-9.22%	17.36%
IMCB iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF	14.72%	10.25%	15.10%	16.37%	-16.09%	22.81%	13.35%	31.49%	-11.53%	19.70%

Correlation

The correlation between EQAL and IMCB is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.97
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2014	0.94

The correlation between EQAL and IMCB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

EQAL vs. IMCB - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EQAL	IMCB
Technology	14.8%	21.3%
Industrials	9.5%	19.0%
Financial Services	9.4%	12.0%
Healthcare	9.4%	7.9%
Energy	9.1%	7.4%
Real Estate	9.1%	4.3%
Consumer Defensive	8.1%	5.1%
Basic Materials	8.0%	5.3%
Utilities	7.9%	6.2%
Consumer Cyclical	7.7%	9.0%
Communication Services	7.2%	2.3%

Return for Risk

EQAL vs. IMCB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EQAL

EQAL Risk / Return Rank: 63
EQAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
EQAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
EQAL Omega Ratio Rank: 56
EQAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
EQAL Martin Ratio Rank: 69

IMCB

IMCB Risk / Return Rank: 56
IMCB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
IMCB Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
IMCB Omega Ratio Rank: 51
IMCB Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
IMCB Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EQAL vs. IMCB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF (EQAL) and iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EQAL	IMCB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.99	1.83	+0.16
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.85	2.61	+0.24
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.35	1.32	+0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.66	2.90	+0.76
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	12.89	11.50	+1.39
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EQAL vs. IMCB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EQAL Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the IMCB Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EQAL and IMCB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EQAL	IMCB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.99	1.83	+0.16
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.40	0.50	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.57	0.58	-0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.51	0.50	+0.01

Drawdowns

EQAL vs. IMCB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EQAL drawdown since its inception was -40.44%, smaller than the maximum IMCB drawdown of -58.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EQAL and IMCB.

Drawdown Indicators

	EQAL	IMCB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.44%	-58.80%	+18.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.67%	-8.05%	+1.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.62%	-19.80%	+0.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.79%	-25.15%	+3.36%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.44%	-40.99%	+0.55%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.73%	-0.24%	-0.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.10%	-7.73%	+2.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.89%	2.03%	-0.14%

Volatility

EQAL vs. IMCB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF (EQAL) is 3.05%, while iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF (IMCB) has a volatility of 3.31%. This indicates that EQAL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IMCB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EQAL	IMCB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.05%	3.31%	-0.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.61%	9.58%	-0.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.30%	12.75%	-0.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.28%	17.57%	-0.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.88%	19.65%	-0.77%

EQAL vs. IMCB - Expense Ratio Comparison

EQAL has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than IMCB's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

EQAL vs. IMCB - Dividend Comparison

EQAL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, more than IMCB's 1.21% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EQAL Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF	1.64%	1.79%	1.62%	1.88%	1.95%	1.32%	1.63%	1.61%	1.62%	1.18%	1.57%	1.64%
IMCB iShares Morningstar Mid-Cap ETF	1.21%	1.42%	1.43%	1.55%	1.70%	1.08%	1.12%	1.32%	1.80%	1.31%	1.79%	1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EQAL and IMCB in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, EQAL and IMCB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, EQAL or IMCB?

IMCB has higher volatility (3.31%) compared to EQAL (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EQAL dropped -40.44% vs IMCB's -58.80%.

Which ETF is better, EQAL or IMCB?

On 10-year performance, IMCB leads with 11.32% vs 10.66% for EQAL. On fees, IMCB is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, EQAL has been the lower-risk option at 3.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EQAL or IMCB?

Over the 10-year period, IMCB has performed better with a 11.32% return vs 10.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EQAL or IMCB?

IMCB is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for EQAL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EQAL or IMCB?

EQAL has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 1.21% for IMCB.

What is the main difference between EQAL and IMCB?

EQAL tracks Russell 1000 Equal Weight Index, while IMCB tracks IMCB-US - Morningstar U.S. Mid Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for EQAL and 0.04% for IMCB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EQAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.