EPV vs. SQQQ
EPV (ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe) and SQQQ (ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - EPV tracks the FTSE All Cap Developed Europe (-200%) while SQQQ tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EPV returned -22.51%/yr vs -55.28%/yr for SQQQ. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
EPV vs. SQQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EPV achieves a -13.88% return, which is significantly higher than SQQQ's -40.27% return. Over the past 10 years, EPV has outperformed SQQQ with an annualized return of -22.51%, while SQQQ has yielded a comparatively lower -55.28% annualized return.
EPV
- 1D
- 1.98%
- 1M
- 1.66%
- 6M
- -8.73%
- YTD
- -13.88%
- 1Y
- -25.33%
- 3Y*
- -22.94%
- 5Y*
- -18.56%
- 10Y*
- -22.51%
SQQQ
- 1D
- 5.74%
- 1M
- 1.37%
- 6M
- -36.57%
- YTD
- -40.27%
- 1Y
- -56.10%
- 3Y*
- -51.78%
- 5Y*
- -45.66%
- 10Y*
- -55.28%
EPV vs. SQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPV ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe | -13.88% | -45.21% | 2.02% | -30.81% | 15.53% | -31.62% | -37.31% | -36.11% | 32.22% | -39.79% |
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | -40.27% | -53.05% | -49.79% | -73.61% | 82.40% | -60.87% | -86.40% | -65.92% | -20.83% | -58.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between EPV and SQQQ is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 11, 2010 | 0.66 |
The correlation between EPV and SQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
EPV vs. SQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EPV
SQQQ
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
EPV
SQQQ
Basic Materials
EPV
-
SQQQ
-
Communication Services
EPV
-
SQQQ
-
Consumer Cyclical
EPV
-
SQQQ
-
Consumer Defensive
EPV
-
SQQQ
-
Energy
EPV
-
SQQQ
-
Healthcare
EPV
-
SQQQ
-
Industrials
EPV
-
SQQQ
-
Real Estate
EPV
-
SQQQ
-
Technology
EPV
-
SQQQ
-
Utilities
EPV
-
SQQQ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EPV vs. SQQQ — Risk / Return Rank
EPV
SQQQ
EPV vs. SQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe (EPV) and ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EPV | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.88 | 0.82 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.76 | -0.92 | +0.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.24 | -1.71 | +0.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EPV vs. SQQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EPV drawdown since its inception was -99.40%, roughly equal to the maximum SQQQ drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPV and SQQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EPV | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.40% | -100.00% | +0.60% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -33.63% | -61.03% | +27.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -66.78% | -92.51% | +25.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -79.99% | -97.27% | +17.28% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -92.86% | -99.97% | +7.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.37% | -100.00% | +0.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -88.43% | -92.75% | +4.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.48% | 32.78% | -12.30% |
Volatility
EPV vs. SQQQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe (EPV) is 10.05%, while ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ (SQQQ) has a volatility of 26.05%. This indicates that EPV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EPV | SQQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.05% | 26.05% | -16.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.90% | 45.88% | -17.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.23% | 55.64% | -23.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.93% | 67.87% | -31.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.84% | 66.56% | -29.72% |
EPV vs. SQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both EPV and SQQQ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
EPV vs. SQQQ - Dividend Comparison
EPV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.64%, less than SQQQ's 10.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPV ProShares UltraShort FTSE Europe | 4.64% | 4.80% | 4.83% | 3.17% | 0.33% | 0.01% | 0.09% | 1.10% | 0.19% | 0.00% |
SQQQ ProShares UltraPro Short QQQ | 10.00% | 9.36% | 10.23% | 8.01% | 0.28% | 0.00% | 2.15% | 2.92% | 1.47% | 0.14% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EPV and SQQQ have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SQQQ has higher volatility (26.05%) compared to EPV (10.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPV dropped -99.40% vs SQQQ's -100.00%.
On 10-year performance, EPV leads with -22.51% vs -55.28% for SQQQ. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, EPV has been the lower-risk option at 10.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EPV has performed better with a -22.51% return vs -55.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EPV and SQQQ have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
SQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 10.00%, compared with 4.64% for EPV.
EPV tracks FTSE All Cap Developed Europe (-200%), while SQQQ tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-300%).
EPV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.79 vs -1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EPV and SQQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer