EPRF vs. QTPI
EPRF (Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF) and QTPI (North Square RCIM Tax-Advantaged Preferred and Income Securities ETF) are both Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds funds. EPRF is passively managed, while QTPI is actively managed. Over the past year, EPRF returned 2.04% vs 5.09% for QTPI. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EPRF charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QTPI.
Performance
EPRF vs. QTPI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EPRF achieves a -2.39% return, which is significantly lower than QTPI's 0.84% return.
EPRF
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- -1.18%
- YTD
- -2.39%
- 6M
- -2.28%
- 1Y
- 2.04%
- 3Y*
- 2.39%
- 5Y*
- -1.97%
- 10Y*
- —
QTPI
- 1D
- -0.59%
- 1M
- 0.10%
- YTD
- 0.84%
- 6M
- 1.41%
- 1Y
- 5.09%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EPRF vs. QTPI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
EPRF Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF | -2.39% | 2.69% | -0.79% |
QTPI North Square RCIM Tax-Advantaged Preferred and Income Securities ETF | 0.84% | 7.37% | 0.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between EPRF and QTPI is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2024 | 0.59 |
The correlation between EPRF and QTPI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EPRF vs. QTPI — Risk / Return Rank
EPRF
QTPI
EPRF vs. QTPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF (EPRF) and North Square RCIM Tax-Advantaged Preferred and Income Securities ETF (QTPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EPRF | QTPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.22 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.24 | 2.42 | -2.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.51 | 9.97 | -9.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EPRF | QTPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 | 1.23 | -0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.17 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.08 | 1.19 | -1.11 |
Drawdowns
EPRF vs. QTPI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EPRF drawdown since its inception was -26.82%, which is greater than QTPI's maximum drawdown of -4.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPRF and QTPI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EPRF | QTPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.82% | -4.08% | -22.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.59% | -2.11% | -6.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.29% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.23% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.06% | -0.68% | -10.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.37% | -0.40% | -6.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.01% | 0.52% | +3.49% |
Volatility
EPRF vs. QTPI - Volatility Comparison
Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF (EPRF) has a higher volatility of 2.14% compared to North Square RCIM Tax-Advantaged Preferred and Income Securities ETF (QTPI) at 1.42%. This indicates that EPRF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QTPI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EPRF | QTPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.14% | 1.42% | +0.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.46% | 3.19% | +2.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.55% | 4.55% | +3.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.81% | 4.98% | +6.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.49% | 4.98% | +8.51% |
EPRF vs. QTPI - Expense Ratio Comparison
EPRF has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than QTPI's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
EPRF vs. QTPI - Dividend Comparison
EPRF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.18%, more than QTPI's 4.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPRF Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF | 6.18% | 6.03% | 6.13% | 5.71% | 5.67% | 4.70% | 4.92% | 5.01% | 5.27% | 2.59% |
QTPI North Square RCIM Tax-Advantaged Preferred and Income Securities ETF | 4.44% | 4.58% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EPRF and QTPI have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EPRF has higher volatility (2.14%) compared to QTPI (1.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPRF dropped -26.82% vs QTPI's -4.08%.
On 1-year performance, QTPI leads with 5.09% vs 2.04% for EPRF. On fees, EPRF is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, QTPI has been the lower-risk option at 1.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, QTPI has performed better with a 5.09% return vs 2.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EPRF is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QTPI.
EPRF has the higher dividend yield at 6.18%, compared with 4.44% for QTPI.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and North Square. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for EPRF and 0.60% for QTPI.
QTPI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EPRF and QTPI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer