EPRF vs. QPFF
EPRF (Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF) and QPFF (American Century Quality Preferred ETF) are both Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds funds. EPRF is passively managed, while QPFF is actively managed. EPRF charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for QPFF.
Performance
EPRF vs. QPFF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
EPRF
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- -1.18%
- YTD
- -2.39%
- 6M
- -2.28%
- 1Y
- 2.04%
- 3Y*
- 2.39%
- 5Y*
- -1.97%
- 10Y*
- —
QPFF
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
EPRF vs. QPFF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
EPRF Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF | -2.46% |
QPFF American Century Quality Preferred ETF | 0.00% |
EPRF vs. QPFF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EPRF
QPFF
Financial Services
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
EPRF
QPFF
Real Estate
EPRF
QPFF
Basic Materials
EPRF
-
QPFF
Communication Services
EPRF
-
QPFF
Consumer Cyclical
EPRF
-
QPFF
Consumer Defensive
EPRF
-
QPFF
-
Energy
EPRF
-
QPFF
-
Healthcare
EPRF
-
QPFF
-
Industrials
EPRF
-
QPFF
Technology
EPRF
-
QPFF
-
Utilities
EPRF
-
QPFF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EPRF vs. QPFF — Risk / Return Rank
EPRF
QPFF
EPRF vs. QPFF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF (EPRF) and American Century Quality Preferred ETF (QPFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EPRF | QPFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.24 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.51 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EPRF | QPFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.17 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.08 | — | — |
Drawdowns
EPRF vs. QPFF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EPRF drawdown since its inception was -26.82%, which is greater than QPFF's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPRF and QPFF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EPRF | QPFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.82% | 0.00% | -26.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.59% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.29% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.23% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.06% | 0.00% | -11.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.37% | 0.00% | -7.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.01% | — | — |
Volatility
EPRF vs. QPFF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EPRF | QPFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.14% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.46% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.55% | 0.00% | +7.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.81% | 0.00% | +11.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.49% | 0.00% | +13.49% |
EPRF vs. QPFF - Expense Ratio Comparison
EPRF has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than QPFF's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
EPRF vs. QPFF - Dividend Comparison
EPRF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.18%, while QPFF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPRF Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF | 6.18% | 6.03% | 6.13% | 5.71% | 5.67% | 4.70% | 4.92% | 5.01% | 5.27% | 2.59% |
QPFF American Century Quality Preferred ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, QPFF is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QPFF is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for EPRF.
EPRF has the higher dividend yield at 6.18%, compared with 0.00% for QPFF.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and American Century. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for EPRF and 0.33% for QPFF.
Find the right allocation for EPRF and QPFF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer