PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EPRF vs. PFFV
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

EPRF vs. PFFV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF (EPRF) and Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF (PFFV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

EPRF vs. PFFV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
EPRF
Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF
-4.28%2.69%3.46%9.43%-20.68%1.37%8.58%
PFFV
Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF
-0.58%2.08%9.45%10.64%-13.81%6.35%13.36%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPRF achieves a -4.28% return, which is significantly lower than PFFV's -0.58% return.


EPRF

1D
0.12%
1M
-3.39%
YTD
-4.28%
6M
-6.59%
1Y
-0.37%
3Y*
2.18%
5Y*
-2.07%
10Y*

PFFV

1D
-0.05%
1M
-2.10%
YTD
-0.58%
6M
-1.34%
1Y
-0.06%
3Y*
6.19%
5Y*
2.00%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


EPRF vs. PFFV - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPRF has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than PFFV's 0.25% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

EPRF vs. PFFV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EPRF
EPRF Risk / Return Rank: 1010
Overall Rank
EPRF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPRF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPRF Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
EPRF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPRF Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

PFFV
PFFV Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
PFFV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFFV Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFFV Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
PFFV Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFFV Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPRF vs. PFFV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF (EPRF) and Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF (PFFV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EPRFPFFVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.04

-0.01

-0.03

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.00

0.02

-0.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.00

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.08

0.04

-0.12

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.20

0.13

-0.33

EPRF vs. PFFV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPRF Sharpe Ratio is -0.04, which is lower than the PFFV Sharpe Ratio of -0.01. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPRF and PFFV, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EPRFPFFVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

-0.01

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.18

0.23

-0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.07

0.49

-0.43

Correlation

The correlation between EPRF and PFFV is 0.74, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

EPRF vs. PFFV - Dividend Comparison

EPRF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.30%, less than PFFV's 8.35% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
EPRF
Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF
6.30%6.03%6.13%5.71%5.67%4.70%4.92%5.01%5.27%2.59%
PFFV
Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF
8.35%8.26%7.33%7.17%6.60%5.23%2.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

EPRF vs. PFFV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPRF drawdown since its inception was -26.82%, which is greater than PFFV's maximum drawdown of -18.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPRF and PFFV.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


EPRFPFFVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.82%

-18.96%

-7.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.59%

-4.35%

-4.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.23%

-18.96%

-6.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.78%

-3.23%

-9.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.31%

-4.29%

-3.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.25%

1.50%

+1.75%

Volatility

EPRF vs. PFFV - Volatility Comparison

Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF (EPRF) has a higher volatility of 2.42% compared to Global X Variable Rate Preferred ETF (PFFV) at 1.48%. This indicates that EPRF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFFV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


EPRFPFFVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.42%

1.48%

+0.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.27%

2.94%

+2.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.88%

5.62%

+3.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.73%

8.85%

+2.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.57%

8.79%

+4.78%