EPRF vs. LOUP
EPRF (Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF) and LOUP (Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EPRF is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund tracking the S&P U.S. High Quality Preferred Stock Index, while LOUP is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Deepwater Frontier Tech Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EPRF returned -1.97%/yr vs 12.98%/yr for LOUP. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EPRF charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for LOUP.
Performance
EPRF vs. LOUP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EPRF achieves a -2.39% return, which is significantly lower than LOUP's 28.21% return.
EPRF
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- -1.18%
- YTD
- -2.39%
- 6M
- -2.28%
- 1Y
- 2.04%
- 3Y*
- 2.39%
- 5Y*
- -1.97%
- 10Y*
- —
LOUP
- 1D
- -1.87%
- 1M
- 18.57%
- YTD
- 28.21%
- 6M
- 26.83%
- 1Y
- 75.49%
- 3Y*
- 37.37%
- 5Y*
- 12.98%
- 10Y*
- —
EPRF vs. LOUP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPRF Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF | -2.39% | 2.69% | 3.46% | 9.43% | -20.68% | 1.37% | 7.38% | 19.54% | -7.62% |
LOUP Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF | 28.21% | 43.24% | 21.80% | 51.31% | -46.00% | 7.54% | 86.25% | 31.76% | -19.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between EPRF and LOUP is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2018 | 0.42 |
EPRF vs. LOUP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EPRF
LOUP
Financial Services
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
EPRF
LOUP
Real Estate
EPRF
LOUP
-
Basic Materials
EPRF
-
LOUP
-
Communication Services
EPRF
-
LOUP
Consumer Cyclical
EPRF
-
LOUP
Consumer Defensive
EPRF
-
LOUP
-
Energy
EPRF
-
LOUP
Healthcare
EPRF
-
LOUP
Industrials
EPRF
-
LOUP
Technology
EPRF
-
LOUP
Utilities
EPRF
-
LOUP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EPRF vs. LOUP — Risk / Return Rank
EPRF
LOUP
EPRF vs. LOUP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF (EPRF) and Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EPRF | LOUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.41 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.24 | 3.61 | -3.38 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.51 | 12.23 | -11.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EPRF | LOUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 | 2.66 | -2.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.17 | 0.40 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.08 | 0.59 | -0.51 |
Drawdowns
EPRF vs. LOUP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EPRF drawdown since its inception was -26.82%, smaller than the maximum LOUP drawdown of -58.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPRF and LOUP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EPRF | LOUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.82% | -58.68% | +31.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.59% | -21.00% | +12.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.29% | -35.23% | +22.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.23% | -55.63% | +30.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.06% | -1.87% | -9.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.37% | -20.04% | +12.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.01% | 6.19% | -2.18% |
Volatility
EPRF vs. LOUP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF (EPRF) is 2.14%, while Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF (LOUP) has a volatility of 8.23%. This indicates that EPRF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LOUP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EPRF | LOUP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.14% | 8.23% | -6.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.46% | 21.94% | -16.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.55% | 28.51% | -20.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.81% | 32.38% | -20.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.49% | 31.96% | -18.47% |
EPRF vs. LOUP - Expense Ratio Comparison
EPRF has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than LOUP's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
EPRF vs. LOUP - Dividend Comparison
EPRF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.18%, while LOUP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPRF Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF | 6.18% | 6.03% | 6.13% | 5.71% | 5.67% | 4.70% | 4.92% | 5.01% | 5.27% | 2.59% |
LOUP Innovator Deepwater Frontier Tech ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EPRF and LOUP have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LOUP has higher volatility (8.23%) compared to EPRF (2.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPRF dropped -26.82% vs LOUP's -58.68%.
On 5-year performance, LOUP leads with 12.98% vs -1.97% for EPRF. On fees, EPRF is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, EPRF has been the lower-risk option at 2.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, LOUP has performed better with a 12.98% return vs -1.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EPRF is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for LOUP.
EPRF has the higher dividend yield at 6.18%, compared with 0.00% for LOUP.
EPRF is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while LOUP is Technology Equities. EPRF tracks S&P U.S. High Quality Preferred Stock Index, while LOUP tracks Deepwater Frontier Tech Index. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for EPRF and 0.70% for LOUP.
LOUP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.66 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EPRF and LOUP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer