EPRF vs. IPPP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EPRF (Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF) and IPPP (Preferred-Plus ETF) are both Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds funds. EPRF is passively managed, while IPPP is actively managed. EPRF charges 0.47%/yr vs 1.27%/yr for IPPP.

Performance

EPRF vs. IPPP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF (EPRF) and Preferred-Plus ETF (IPPP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

EPRF

• 1D: -0.41%
• 1M: -1.18%
• YTD: -2.39%
• 6M: -2.28%
• 1Y: 2.04%
• 3Y*: 2.39%
• 5Y*: -1.97%
• 10Y*: —

IPPP

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPRF vs. IPPP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
EPRF Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF	-2.46%
IPPP Preferred-Plus ETF	0.00%

EPRF vs. IPPP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EPRF	IPPP
Financial Services	55.9%	-
Real Estate	7.6%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	100.0%

Return for Risk

EPRF vs. IPPP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EPRF

EPRF Risk / Return Rank: 12
EPRF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
EPRF Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
EPRF Omega Ratio Rank: 11
EPRF Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
EPRF Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPRF vs. IPPP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF (EPRF) and Preferred-Plus ETF (IPPP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EPRF	IPPP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.27	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.44	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.05	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.24	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.51	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EPRF	IPPP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.27	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.17	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.08	—	—

Drawdowns

EPRF vs. IPPP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPRF drawdown since its inception was -26.82%, which is greater than IPPP's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPRF and IPPP.

Drawdown Indicators

	EPRF	IPPP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-26.82%	0.00%	-26.82%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.59%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.29%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.23%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.06%	0.00%	-11.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.37%	0.00%	-7.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.01%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	EPRF	IPPP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.14%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.46%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.55%	0.00%	+7.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.81%	0.00%	+11.81%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.49%	0.00%	+13.49%

EPRF vs. IPPP - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPRF has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than IPPP's 1.27% expense ratio.

Dividends

EPRF vs. IPPP - Dividend Comparison

EPRF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.18%, while IPPP has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EPRF Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF	6.18%	6.03%	6.13%	5.71%	5.67%	4.70%	4.92%	5.01%	5.27%	2.59%
IPPP Preferred-Plus ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, EPRF or IPPP?

On fees, EPRF is cheaper at 0.47% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, EPRF or IPPP?

EPRF is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 1.27% for IPPP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EPRF or IPPP?

EPRF has the higher dividend yield at 6.18%, compared with 0.00% for IPPP.

What is the main difference between EPRF and IPPP?

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Innovative Portfolios. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for EPRF and 1.27% for IPPP.