PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EPRF vs. FPEI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EPRF vs. FPEI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF (EPRF) and First Trust Institutional Preferred Securities & Income ETF (FPEI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPRF achieves a -2.39% return, which is significantly lower than FPEI's 1.56% return.


EPRF

1D
-0.41%
1M
-1.18%
YTD
-2.39%
6M
-2.28%
1Y
2.04%
3Y*
2.39%
5Y*
-1.97%
10Y*

FPEI

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.94%
YTD
1.56%
6M
1.80%
1Y
8.60%
3Y*
10.69%
5Y*
4.20%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPRF vs. FPEI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EPRF
Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF
-2.39%2.69%3.46%9.43%-20.68%1.37%7.38%19.54%-5.58%0.75%
FPEI
First Trust Institutional Preferred Securities & Income ETF
1.56%9.82%10.94%6.29%-8.19%4.63%7.08%15.86%-4.29%2.23%

Correlation

The correlation between EPRF and FPEI is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 24, 2017

0.41

The correlation between EPRF and FPEI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.41 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EPRF vs. FPEI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EPRF
EPRF Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
EPRF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPRF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPRF Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
EPRF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPRF Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

FPEI
FPEI Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FPEI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPEI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPEI Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
FPEI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPEI Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPRF vs. FPEI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF (EPRF) and First Trust Institutional Preferred Securities & Income ETF (FPEI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EPRFFPEIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.54

-0.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.24

2.38

-2.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.51

11.84

-11.33

EPRF vs. FPEI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPRF Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is lower than the FPEI Sharpe Ratio of 2.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPRF and FPEI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EPRFFPEIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

2.34

-2.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.17

0.71

-0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

0.57

-0.48

Drawdowns

EPRF vs. FPEI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPRF drawdown since its inception was -26.82%, roughly equal to the maximum FPEI drawdown of -27.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPRF and FPEI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EPRFFPEIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.82%

-27.51%

+0.69%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.59%

-3.63%

-4.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.29%

-4.26%

-8.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.23%

-16.46%

-8.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.06%

-0.16%

-10.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.37%

-3.06%

-4.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.01%

0.73%

+3.28%

Volatility

EPRF vs. FPEI - Volatility Comparison

Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF (EPRF) has a higher volatility of 2.14% compared to First Trust Institutional Preferred Securities & Income ETF (FPEI) at 0.95%. This indicates that EPRF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FPEI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EPRFFPEIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.14%

0.95%

+1.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.46%

3.06%

+2.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.55%

3.69%

+3.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.81%

5.97%

+5.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.49%

8.86%

+4.63%

EPRF vs. FPEI - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPRF has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than FPEI's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

EPRF vs. FPEI - Dividend Comparison

EPRF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.18%, more than FPEI's 5.72% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
EPRF
Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF
6.18%6.03%6.13%5.71%5.67%4.70%4.92%5.01%5.27%2.59%
FPEI
First Trust Institutional Preferred Securities & Income ETF
5.72%5.62%5.55%5.76%5.20%4.46%4.90%5.02%5.81%1.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


EPRF and FPEI have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EPRF has higher volatility (2.14%) compared to FPEI (0.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPRF dropped -26.82% vs FPEI's -27.51%.

On 5-year performance, FPEI leads with 4.20% vs -1.97% for EPRF. On fees, EPRF is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, FPEI has been the lower-risk option at 0.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FPEI has performed better with a 4.20% return vs -1.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EPRF is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FPEI.

EPRF has the higher dividend yield at 6.18%, compared with 5.72% for FPEI.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for EPRF and 0.85% for FPEI.

FPEI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.34 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EPRF and FPEI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer