PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EPRF vs. BUFF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EPRF vs. BUFF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF (EPRF) and Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPRF achieves a -2.39% return, which is significantly lower than BUFF's 5.42% return.


EPRF

1D
-0.41%
1M
-1.18%
YTD
-2.39%
6M
-2.28%
1Y
2.04%
3Y*
2.39%
5Y*
-1.97%
10Y*

BUFF

1D
-0.27%
1M
1.68%
YTD
5.42%
6M
5.90%
1Y
14.36%
3Y*
12.47%
5Y*
8.71%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPRF vs. BUFF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EPRF
Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF
-2.39%2.69%3.46%9.43%-20.68%1.37%7.38%19.54%-5.58%-0.31%
BUFF
Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF
5.42%11.02%12.05%16.51%-4.44%8.37%-12.08%32.32%-7.04%7.03%

Correlation

The correlation between EPRF and BUFF is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.52

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2017

0.40

The correlation between EPRF and BUFF shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (all time) to 0.52 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EPRF vs. BUFF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EPRF
BUFF

Financial Services

55.9%
11.9%

Real Estate

7.6%
1.9%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Communication Services

-

10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.9%

Energy

-

3.5%

Healthcare

-

8.4%

Industrials

-

8.1%

Technology

-

36.2%

Utilities

-

2.3%

Financial Services

EPRF
55.9%
BUFF
11.9%

Real Estate

EPRF
7.6%
BUFF
1.9%

Basic Materials

EPRF

-

BUFF
1.8%

Communication Services

EPRF

-

BUFF
10.9%

Consumer Cyclical

EPRF

-

BUFF
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

EPRF

-

BUFF
4.9%

Energy

EPRF

-

BUFF
3.5%

Healthcare

EPRF

-

BUFF
8.4%

Industrials

EPRF

-

BUFF
8.1%

Technology

EPRF

-

BUFF
36.2%

Utilities

EPRF

-

BUFF
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EPRF vs. BUFF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EPRF
EPRF Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
EPRF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPRF Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPRF Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
EPRF Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPRF Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFF
BUFF Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
BUFF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFF Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFF Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPRF vs. BUFF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF (EPRF) and Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EPRFBUFFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.58

-0.53

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.24

4.02

-3.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.51

21.50

-20.99

EPRF vs. BUFF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPRF Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is lower than the BUFF Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPRF and BUFF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EPRFBUFFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

2.80

-2.53

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.17

1.04

-1.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.08

0.49

-0.41

Drawdowns

EPRF vs. BUFF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPRF drawdown since its inception was -26.82%, smaller than the maximum BUFF drawdown of -46.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPRF and BUFF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EPRFBUFFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-26.82%

-46.23%

+19.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.59%

-3.58%

-5.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.29%

-10.24%

-2.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.23%

-10.24%

-14.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.06%

-0.27%

-10.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.37%

-6.18%

-1.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.01%

0.67%

+3.34%

Volatility

EPRF vs. BUFF - Volatility Comparison

Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF (EPRF) has a higher volatility of 2.14% compared to Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF) at 1.02%. This indicates that EPRF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUFF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EPRFBUFFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.14%

1.02%

+1.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.46%

3.83%

+1.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.55%

5.15%

+2.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.81%

8.41%

+3.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.49%

17.67%

-4.18%

EPRF vs. BUFF - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPRF has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFF's 0.89% expense ratio.


Dividends

EPRF vs. BUFF - Dividend Comparison

EPRF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.18%, while BUFF has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BUFF
Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.78%1.26%1.74%1.55%0.18%
EPRF
Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF
6.18%6.03%6.13%5.71%5.67%4.70%4.92%5.01%5.27%2.59%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EPRF and BUFF have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EPRF has higher volatility (2.14%) compared to BUFF (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPRF dropped -26.82% vs BUFF's -46.23%.

On 5-year performance, BUFF leads with 8.71% vs -1.97% for EPRF. On fees, EPRF is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, BUFF has been the lower-risk option at 1.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BUFF has performed better with a 8.71% return vs -1.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EPRF is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for BUFF.

EPRF has the higher dividend yield at 6.18%, compared with 0.00% for BUFF.

EPRF is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while BUFF is Defined Outcome. EPRF tracks S&P U.S. High Quality Preferred Stock Index, while BUFF tracks Refinitiv Laddered Power Buffer Strategy Index. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for EPRF and 0.89% for BUFF.

BUFF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EPRF and BUFF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer