EPRF vs. BUFF
EPRF (Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF) and BUFF (Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EPRF is a Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds fund tracking the S&P U.S. High Quality Preferred Stock Index, while BUFF is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the Refinitiv Laddered Power Buffer Strategy Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EPRF returned -1.97%/yr vs 8.71%/yr for BUFF. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EPRF charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for BUFF.
Performance
EPRF vs. BUFF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EPRF achieves a -2.39% return, which is significantly lower than BUFF's 5.42% return.
EPRF
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- -1.18%
- YTD
- -2.39%
- 6M
- -2.28%
- 1Y
- 2.04%
- 3Y*
- 2.39%
- 5Y*
- -1.97%
- 10Y*
- —
BUFF
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 1.68%
- YTD
- 5.42%
- 6M
- 5.90%
- 1Y
- 14.36%
- 3Y*
- 12.47%
- 5Y*
- 8.71%
- 10Y*
- —
EPRF vs. BUFF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPRF Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF | -2.39% | 2.69% | 3.46% | 9.43% | -20.68% | 1.37% | 7.38% | 19.54% | -5.58% | -0.31% |
BUFF Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF | 5.42% | 11.02% | 12.05% | 16.51% | -4.44% | 8.37% | -12.08% | 32.32% | -7.04% | 7.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between EPRF and BUFF is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 5, 2017 | 0.40 |
The correlation between EPRF and BUFF shifts across timeframes, from 0.40 (all time) to 0.52 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EPRF vs. BUFF - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EPRF
BUFF
Financial Services
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
EPRF
BUFF
Real Estate
EPRF
BUFF
Basic Materials
EPRF
-
BUFF
Communication Services
EPRF
-
BUFF
Consumer Cyclical
EPRF
-
BUFF
Consumer Defensive
EPRF
-
BUFF
Energy
EPRF
-
BUFF
Healthcare
EPRF
-
BUFF
Industrials
EPRF
-
BUFF
Technology
EPRF
-
BUFF
Utilities
EPRF
-
BUFF
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EPRF vs. BUFF — Risk / Return Rank
EPRF
BUFF
EPRF vs. BUFF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF (EPRF) and Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EPRF | BUFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.58 | -0.53 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.24 | 4.02 | -3.79 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.51 | 21.50 | -20.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EPRF | BUFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.27 | 2.80 | -2.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.17 | 1.04 | -1.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.08 | 0.49 | -0.41 |
Drawdowns
EPRF vs. BUFF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EPRF drawdown since its inception was -26.82%, smaller than the maximum BUFF drawdown of -46.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPRF and BUFF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EPRF | BUFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.82% | -46.23% | +19.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.59% | -3.58% | -5.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.29% | -10.24% | -2.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.23% | -10.24% | -14.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.06% | -0.27% | -10.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.37% | -6.18% | -1.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.01% | 0.67% | +3.34% |
Volatility
EPRF vs. BUFF - Volatility Comparison
Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF (EPRF) has a higher volatility of 2.14% compared to Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF (BUFF) at 1.02%. This indicates that EPRF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUFF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EPRF | BUFF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.14% | 1.02% | +1.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.46% | 3.83% | +1.63% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.55% | 5.15% | +2.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.81% | 8.41% | +3.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.49% | 17.67% | -4.18% |
EPRF vs. BUFF - Expense Ratio Comparison
EPRF has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFF's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
EPRF vs. BUFF - Dividend Comparison
EPRF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.18%, while BUFF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUFF Innovator Laddered Allocation Power Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.78% | 1.26% | 1.74% | 1.55% | 0.18% |
EPRF Innovator S&P High Quality Preferred ETF | 6.18% | 6.03% | 6.13% | 5.71% | 5.67% | 4.70% | 4.92% | 5.01% | 5.27% | 2.59% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EPRF and BUFF have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EPRF has higher volatility (2.14%) compared to BUFF (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPRF dropped -26.82% vs BUFF's -46.23%.
On 5-year performance, BUFF leads with 8.71% vs -1.97% for EPRF. On fees, EPRF is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, BUFF has been the lower-risk option at 1.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BUFF has performed better with a 8.71% return vs -1.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EPRF is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for BUFF.
EPRF has the higher dividend yield at 6.18%, compared with 0.00% for BUFF.
EPRF is categorized as Preferred Stock/Convertible Bonds, while BUFF is Defined Outcome. EPRF tracks S&P U.S. High Quality Preferred Stock Index, while BUFF tracks Refinitiv Laddered Power Buffer Strategy Index. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for EPRF and 0.89% for BUFF.
BUFF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EPRF and BUFF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer