PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
EPP vs. ENZL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

EPP vs. ENZL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EPP (iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF) and ENZL (iShares MSCI New Zealand ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds from iShares - EPP tracks the MSCI Pacific ex-Japan Index while ENZL tracks the MSCI New Zealand Investable Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EPP returned 7.60%/yr vs 3.34%/yr for ENZL. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EPP charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for ENZL.

Performance

EPP vs. ENZL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF (EPP) and iShares MSCI New Zealand ETF (ENZL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPP achieves a 9.57% return, which is significantly higher than ENZL's -0.60% return. Over the past 10 years, EPP has outperformed ENZL with an annualized return of 7.60%, while ENZL has yielded a comparatively lower 3.34% annualized return.

EPP

1D
-1.07%
1M
1.12%
YTD
9.57%
6M
10.96%
1Y
17.40%
3Y*
13.26%
5Y*
4.65%
10Y*
7.60%

ENZL

1D
-1.64%
1M
0.88%
YTD
-0.60%
6M
-1.29%
1Y
3.15%
3Y*
-0.29%
5Y*
-4.24%
10Y*
3.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPP vs. ENZL - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EPP
iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF		9.57%19.70%4.76%5.76%-6.59%4.26%6.04%18.30%-10.78%26.05%
ENZL
iShares MSCI New Zealand ETF		-0.60%2.47%-4.86%2.95%-16.18%-11.39%20.04%30.09%0.35%24.04%

Correlation

The correlation between EPP and ENZL is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2010

0.65

The correlation between EPP and ENZL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

EPP vs. ENZL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
EPP
ENZL

Financial Services

46.0%
1.4%

Basic Materials

14.6%
3.8%

Industrials

8.6%
19.0%

Real Estate

7.8%
12.6%

Consumer Cyclical

6.0%
0.9%

Healthcare

3.7%
26.1%

Utilities

3.6%
29.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.0%
0.8%

Energy

2.9%
2.0%

Communication Services

2.7%
3.7%

Technology

1.1%
0.6%

Financial Services

EPP
46.0%
ENZL
1.4%

Basic Materials

EPP
14.6%
ENZL
3.8%

Industrials

EPP
8.6%
ENZL
19.0%

Real Estate

EPP
7.8%
ENZL
12.6%

Consumer Cyclical

EPP
6.0%
ENZL
0.9%

Healthcare

EPP
3.7%
ENZL
26.1%

Utilities

EPP
3.6%
ENZL
29.0%

Consumer Defensive

EPP
3.0%
ENZL
0.8%

Energy

EPP
2.9%
ENZL
2.0%

Communication Services

EPP
2.7%
ENZL
3.7%

Technology

EPP
1.1%
ENZL
0.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF

iShares MSCI New Zealand ETF

Often compared with EPP:
EPP vs. EWTEPP vs. AAXJEPP vs. BBAXEPP vs. EWHEPP vs. AIAEPP vs. EWYEPP vs. VPL
Often compared with ENZL:
ENZL vs. EIRLENZL vs. EDENENZL vs. MNROENZL vs. IBC6.DEENZL vs. VTIENZL vs. EWQENZL vs. EWA

Return for Risk

EPP vs. ENZL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
EPP
EPP Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
EPP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPP Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
EPP Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPP Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
ENZL
ENZL Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
ENZL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENZL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENZL Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
ENZL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENZL Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPP vs. ENZL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF (EPP) and iShares MSCI New Zealand ETF (ENZL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

EPPENZLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.20
0.20

+1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.74
0.39

+1.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.05

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.99

0.25

+1.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.27

0.70

+5.57

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EPP vs. ENZL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPP Sharpe Ratio is 1.20, which is higher than the ENZL Sharpe Ratio of 0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPP and ENZL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

EPPENZLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.20

0.20

+1.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

-0.23

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

0.16

+0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.39

0.37

+0.02

Drawdowns

EPP vs. ENZL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPP drawdown since its inception was -66.01%, which is greater than ENZL's maximum drawdown of -42.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPP and ENZL.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

EPPENZLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-66.01%

-42.44%

-23.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.79%

-12.90%

+4.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.29%

-20.67%

+1.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.31%

-36.86%

+10.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.30%

-42.44%

+3.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.79%

-29.65%

+26.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.62%

-12.78%

+2.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.78%

4.54%

-1.76%

Volatility

EPP vs. ENZL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF (EPP) is 4.65%, while iShares MSCI New Zealand ETF (ENZL) has a volatility of 6.01%. This indicates that EPP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ENZL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

EPPENZLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.65%

6.01%

-1.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.94%

13.02%

-1.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.51%

15.97%

-1.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.41%

18.59%

-1.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.11%

20.44%

-1.33%

EPP vs. ENZL - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPP has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than ENZL's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

EPP vs. ENZL - Dividend Comparison

EPP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%, more than ENZL's 2.25% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ENZL
iShares MSCI New Zealand ETF		2.25%2.23%2.13%3.00%1.62%2.46%1.66%3.35%3.60%3.69%4.79%4.29%
EPP
iShares MSCI Pacific ex Japan ETF		3.44%3.77%3.81%4.10%4.37%4.58%2.28%3.89%5.00%4.15%3.96%4.90%

Frequently Asked Questions

EPP and ENZL have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ENZL has higher volatility (6.01%) compared to EPP (4.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPP dropped -66.01% vs ENZL's -42.44%.

On 10-year performance, EPP leads with 7.60% vs 3.34% for ENZL. On fees, EPP is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, EPP has been the lower-risk option at 4.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EPP has performed better with a 7.60% return vs 3.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EPP is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for ENZL.

EPP has the higher dividend yield at 3.44%, compared with 2.25% for ENZL.

EPP tracks MSCI Pacific ex-Japan Index, while ENZL tracks MSCI New Zealand Investable Market Index. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for EPP and 0.50% for ENZL.

EPP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EPP and ENZL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer