PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EPOL vs. ENOR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EPOL vs. ENOR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Poland ETF (EPOL) and iShares MSCI Norway ETF (ENOR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPOL achieves a 13.58% return, which is significantly lower than ENOR's 28.21% return. Over the past 10 years, EPOL has outperformed ENOR with an annualized return of 11.45%, while ENOR has yielded a comparatively lower 9.41% annualized return.


EPOL

1D
-0.52%
1M
5.18%
YTD
13.58%
6M
22.93%
1Y
40.50%
3Y*
35.67%
5Y*
15.78%
10Y*
11.45%

ENOR

1D
-0.57%
1M
-1.34%
YTD
28.21%
6M
33.17%
1Y
37.30%
3Y*
23.56%
5Y*
8.25%
10Y*
9.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPOL vs. ENOR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EPOL
iShares MSCI Poland ETF
13.58%77.34%-2.61%50.70%-24.62%12.21%-8.38%-6.13%-13.76%52.43%
ENOR
iShares MSCI Norway ETF
28.21%32.00%-2.29%4.80%-12.53%18.69%2.54%12.77%-8.50%21.98%

Correlation

The correlation between EPOL and ENOR is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 25, 2012

0.55

Over the past year, the correlation between EPOL and ENOR has dropped to 0.28 - well below their long-term average of 0.55, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

EPOL vs. ENOR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EPOL
ENOR

Financial Services

45.6%
22.4%

Energy

14.6%
29.2%

Consumer Cyclical

12.4%
0.2%

Basic Materials

6.6%
10.8%

Communication Services

6.3%
5.8%

Consumer Defensive

5.5%
12.4%

Utilities

5.1%
0.7%

Technology

1.9%
4.1%

Industrials

1.7%
13.9%

Healthcare

0.3%

-

Real Estate

-

0.4%

Financial Services

EPOL
45.6%
ENOR
22.4%

Energy

EPOL
14.6%
ENOR
29.2%

Consumer Cyclical

EPOL
12.4%
ENOR
0.2%

Basic Materials

EPOL
6.6%
ENOR
10.8%

Communication Services

EPOL
6.3%
ENOR
5.8%

Consumer Defensive

EPOL
5.5%
ENOR
12.4%

Utilities

EPOL
5.1%
ENOR
0.7%

Technology

EPOL
1.9%
ENOR
4.1%

Industrials

EPOL
1.7%
ENOR
13.9%

Healthcare

EPOL
0.3%
ENOR

-

Real Estate

EPOL

-

ENOR
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EPOL vs. ENOR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EPOL
EPOL Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
EPOL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPOL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPOL Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
EPOL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPOL Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank

ENOR
ENOR Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
ENOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENOR Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
ENOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENOR Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPOL vs. ENOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Poland ETF (EPOL) and iShares MSCI Norway ETF (ENOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EPOLENORDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.76

2.15

-0.39

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.49

3.04

-0.55

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.37

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.68

4.16

-0.47

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.07

11.78

-1.71

EPOL vs. ENOR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPOL Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is comparable to the ENOR Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPOL and ENOR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EPOLENORDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.76

2.15

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.37

+0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

0.39

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

0.25

-0.04

Drawdowns

EPOL vs. ENOR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPOL drawdown since its inception was -63.72%, which is greater than ENOR's maximum drawdown of -55.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPOL and ENOR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EPOLENORDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.72%

-55.35%

-8.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.04%

-9.01%

-2.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.81%

-15.84%

-5.97%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.21%

-32.65%

-21.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.41%

-54.21%

-7.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.65%

-3.15%

+1.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.89%

-16.58%

-10.31%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.03%

3.18%

+0.85%

Volatility

EPOL vs. ENOR - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Poland ETF (EPOL) has a higher volatility of 7.84% compared to iShares MSCI Norway ETF (ENOR) at 5.14%. This indicates that EPOL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ENOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EPOLENORDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.84%

5.14%

+2.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.35%

13.62%

+3.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.20%

17.43%

+5.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.06%

22.18%

+6.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.65%

24.02%

+3.63%

EPOL vs. ENOR - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPOL has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than ENOR's 0.53% expense ratio.


Dividends

EPOL vs. ENOR - Dividend Comparison

EPOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.21%, more than ENOR's 2.31% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ENOR
iShares MSCI Norway ETF
2.31%2.96%6.32%5.06%4.02%2.24%2.39%3.15%2.79%2.47%2.96%3.24%
EPOL
iShares MSCI Poland ETF
4.21%4.78%6.04%2.87%2.65%1.33%1.44%2.51%1.44%1.88%2.14%2.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


EPOL and ENOR have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EPOL has higher volatility (7.84%) compared to ENOR (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPOL dropped -63.72% vs ENOR's -55.35%.

On 10-year performance, EPOL leads with 11.45% vs 9.41% for ENOR. On fees, ENOR is cheaper at 0.53% per year. On volatility, ENOR has been the lower-risk option at 5.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EPOL has performed better with a 11.45% return vs 9.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ENOR is cheaper with a 0.53% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for EPOL.

EPOL has the higher dividend yield at 4.21%, compared with 2.31% for ENOR.

EPOL tracks MSCI Poland Investable Market Index, while ENOR tracks MSCI Norway IMI 25/50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for EPOL and 0.53% for ENOR.

ENOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EPOL and ENOR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer