EPOL vs. EFNL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

EPOL (iShares MSCI Poland ETF) and EFNL (iShares MSCI Finland ETF) are both Europe Equities funds from iShares - EPOL tracks the MSCI Poland Investable Market Index while EFNL tracks the MSCI Finland IMI 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EPOL returned 11.45%/yr vs 10.12%/yr for EFNL. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. EPOL charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.53%/yr for EFNL.

Performance

EPOL vs. EFNL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Poland ETF (EPOL) and iShares MSCI Finland ETF (EFNL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPOL achieves a 13.58% return, which is significantly lower than EFNL's 21.56% return. Over the past 10 years, EPOL has outperformed EFNL with an annualized return of 11.45%, while EFNL has yielded a comparatively lower 10.12% annualized return.

EPOL

• 1D: -0.52%
• 1M: 5.18%
• YTD: 13.58%
• 6M: 22.93%
• 1Y: 40.50%
• 3Y*: 35.67%
• 5Y*: 15.78%
• 10Y*: 11.45%

EFNL

• 1D: 0.84%
• 1M: 5.22%
• YTD: 21.56%
• 6M: 27.81%
• 1Y: 47.25%
• 3Y*: 21.70%
• 5Y*: 6.95%
• 10Y*: 10.12%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPOL vs. EFNL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EPOL iShares MSCI Poland ETF	13.58%	77.34%	-2.61%	50.70%	-24.62%	12.21%	-8.38%	-6.13%	-13.76%	52.43%
EFNL iShares MSCI Finland ETF	21.56%	53.59%	-5.28%	-0.12%	-17.29%	10.50%	20.19%	13.64%	-6.86%	23.77%

Correlation

The correlation between EPOL and EFNL is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.63
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.60
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.62
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2012	0.59

The correlation between EPOL and EFNL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

EPOL vs. EFNL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EPOL	EFNL
Financial Services	45.6%	26.0%
Energy	14.6%	5.2%
Consumer Cyclical	12.4%	6.6%
Basic Materials	6.6%	6.3%
Communication Services	6.3%	2.6%
Consumer Defensive	5.5%	2.9%
Utilities	5.1%	4.0%
Technology	1.9%	21.4%
Industrials	1.7%	20.8%
Healthcare	0.3%	3.5%
Real Estate	-	0.7%

Return for Risk

EPOL vs. EFNL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EPOL

EPOL Risk / Return Rank: 55
EPOL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
EPOL Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
EPOL Omega Ratio Rank: 45
EPOL Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
EPOL Martin Ratio Rank: 57

EFNL

EFNL Risk / Return Rank: 84
EFNL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
EFNL Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
EFNL Omega Ratio Rank: 75
EFNL Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
EFNL Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPOL vs. EFNL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Poland ETF (EPOL) and iShares MSCI Finland ETF (EFNL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	EPOL	EFNL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.76	2.75	-0.99
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.49	3.59	-1.10
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.46	-0.16
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.68	6.19	-2.50
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.07	21.92	-11.85
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

EPOL vs. EFNL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPOL Sharpe Ratio is 1.76, which is lower than the EFNL Sharpe Ratio of 2.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPOL and EFNL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	EPOL	EFNL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.76	2.75	-0.99
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.55	0.36	+0.19
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.42	0.51	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.21	0.47	-0.25

Drawdowns

EPOL vs. EFNL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPOL drawdown since its inception was -63.72%, which is greater than EFNL's maximum drawdown of -38.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPOL and EFNL.

Drawdown Indicators

	EPOL	EFNL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-63.72%	-38.70%	-25.02%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.04%	-7.92%	-3.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.81%	-18.19%	-3.62%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-54.21%	-38.70%	-15.51%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-61.41%	-38.70%	-22.71%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.65%	0.00%	-1.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.89%	-10.93%	-15.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.03%	2.24%	+1.79%

Volatility

EPOL vs. EFNL - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Poland ETF (EPOL) has a higher volatility of 7.84% compared to iShares MSCI Finland ETF (EFNL) at 7.05%. This indicates that EPOL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFNL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EPOL	EFNL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.84%	7.05%	+0.79%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.35%	13.86%	+3.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	23.20%	17.30%	+5.90%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.06%	19.60%	+9.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.65%	20.09%	+7.56%

EPOL vs. EFNL - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPOL has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than EFNL's 0.53% expense ratio.

Dividends

EPOL vs. EFNL - Dividend Comparison

EPOL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.21%, more than EFNL's 2.79% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EFNL iShares MSCI Finland ETF	2.79%	3.40%	5.05%	4.31%	5.94%	2.29%	2.94%	5.70%	3.83%	3.30%	2.40%	1.57%
EPOL iShares MSCI Poland ETF	4.21%	4.78%	6.04%	2.87%	2.65%	1.33%	1.44%	2.51%	1.44%	1.88%	2.14%	2.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EPOL and EFNL in my portfolio?

EPOL and EFNL have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, EPOL or EFNL?

EPOL has higher volatility (7.84%) compared to EFNL (7.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPOL dropped -63.72% vs EFNL's -38.70%.

Which ETF is better, EPOL or EFNL?

On 10-year performance, EPOL leads with 11.45% vs 10.12% for EFNL. On fees, EFNL is cheaper at 0.53% per year. On volatility, EFNL has been the lower-risk option at 7.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EPOL or EFNL?

Over the 10-year period, EPOL has performed better with a 11.45% return vs 10.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EPOL or EFNL?

EFNL is cheaper with a 0.53% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for EPOL.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EPOL or EFNL?

EPOL has the higher dividend yield at 4.21%, compared with 2.79% for EFNL.

What is the main difference between EPOL and EFNL?

EPOL tracks MSCI Poland Investable Market Index, while EFNL tracks MSCI Finland IMI 25/50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for EPOL and 0.53% for EFNL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EFNL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.