EPIN vs. UMMA

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

EPIN (Harbor International Equity ETF) and UMMA (Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, EPIN returned 37.79% vs 49.17% for UMMA. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EPIN charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for UMMA.

Performance

EPIN vs. UMMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor International Equity ETF (EPIN) and Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF (UMMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPIN achieves a 21.76% return, which is significantly lower than UMMA's 30.40% return.

EPIN

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 3.18%
• YTD: 21.76%
• 6M: 21.92%
• 1Y: 37.79%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UMMA

• 1D: 0.68%
• 1M: 5.16%
• YTD: 30.40%
• 6M: 30.71%
• 1Y: 49.17%
• 3Y*: 22.19%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPIN vs. UMMA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
EPIN Harbor International Equity ETF	21.76%	14.36%
UMMA Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF	30.40%	14.70%

Correlation

The correlation between EPIN and UMMA is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025	0.91

The correlation between EPIN and UMMA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

EPIN vs. UMMA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EPIN	UMMA
Technology	34.1%	48.2%
Industrials	20.4%	12.1%
Financial Services	17.7%	0.0%
Basic Materials	7.3%	8.8%
Healthcare	6.6%	14.8%
Consumer Cyclical	6.1%	7.3%
Energy	4.2%	2.4%
Consumer Defensive	2.5%	5.0%
Communication Services	1.2%	1.0%
Real Estate	-	0.4%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

EPIN vs. UMMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EPIN

EPIN Risk / Return Rank: 73
EPIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
EPIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
EPIN Omega Ratio Rank: 73
EPIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
EPIN Martin Ratio Rank: 75

UMMA

UMMA Risk / Return Rank: 73
UMMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
UMMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
UMMA Omega Ratio Rank: 74
UMMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
UMMA Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPIN vs. UMMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor International Equity ETF (EPIN) and Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF (UMMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EPIN	UMMA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.04	2.18	-0.14
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.78	2.81	-0.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.39	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.26	3.31	-0.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.22	12.63	-0.41

EPIN vs. UMMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPIN Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is comparable to the UMMA Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPIN and UMMA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EPIN vs. UMMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPIN drawdown since its inception was -11.64%, smaller than the maximum UMMA drawdown of -34.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPIN and UMMA.

Drawdown Indicators

	EPIN	UMMA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.64%	-34.17%	+22.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.64%	-14.93%	+3.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-18.73%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.18%	-4.42%	+1.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.81%	-9.73%	+7.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.10%	3.90%	-0.80%

Volatility

EPIN vs. UMMA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Harbor International Equity ETF (EPIN) is 8.48%, while Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF (UMMA) has a volatility of 12.07%. This indicates that EPIN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UMMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EPIN	UMMA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.48%	12.07%	-3.59%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.57%	20.30%	-3.73%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.66%	22.74%	-4.08%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.42%	21.08%	-2.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.42%	21.08%	-2.66%

EPIN vs. UMMA - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPIN has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than UMMA's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

EPIN vs. UMMA - Dividend Comparison

EPIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than UMMA's 0.94% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
EPIN Harbor International Equity ETF	0.65%	0.79%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UMMA Wahed Dow Jones Islamic World ETF	0.94%	1.02%	0.91%	1.09%	1.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EPIN and UMMA in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, EPIN and UMMA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, EPIN or UMMA?

UMMA has higher volatility (12.07%) compared to EPIN (8.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPIN dropped -11.64% vs UMMA's -34.17%.

Which ETF is better, EPIN or UMMA?

On 1-year performance, UMMA leads with 49.17% vs 37.79% for EPIN. On fees, UMMA is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, EPIN has been the lower-risk option at 8.48%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EPIN or UMMA?

Over the 1-year period, UMMA has performed better with a 49.17% return vs 37.79%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EPIN or UMMA?

UMMA is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for EPIN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EPIN or UMMA?

UMMA has the higher dividend yield at 0.94%, compared with 0.65% for EPIN.

What is the main difference between EPIN and UMMA?

They also come from different issuers: Harbor and Wahed. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for EPIN and 0.65% for UMMA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UMMA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.