PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EPIN vs. KEMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EPIN vs. KEMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor International Equity ETF (EPIN) and KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPIN achieves a 24.57% return, which is significantly lower than KEMX's 40.51% return.


EPIN

1D
0.11%
1M
9.68%
YTD
24.57%
6M
28.39%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

KEMX

1D
-1.23%
1M
8.82%
YTD
40.51%
6M
46.50%
1Y
75.91%
3Y*
29.24%
5Y*
13.24%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPIN vs. KEMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between EPIN and KEMX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2025

0.84

EPIN vs. KEMX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EPIN
KEMX

Technology

29.2%
41.2%

Industrials

21.3%
8.6%

Financial Services

19.4%
20.7%

Basic Materials

7.7%
8.2%

Consumer Cyclical

6.8%
5.4%

Healthcare

6.8%
1.7%

Energy

5.1%
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

2.6%
3.0%

Communication Services

1.2%
3.2%

Real Estate

-

1.2%

Utilities

-

2.0%

Technology

EPIN
29.2%
KEMX
41.2%

Industrials

EPIN
21.3%
KEMX
8.6%

Financial Services

EPIN
19.4%
KEMX
20.7%

Basic Materials

EPIN
7.7%
KEMX
8.2%

Consumer Cyclical

EPIN
6.8%
KEMX
5.4%

Healthcare

EPIN
6.8%
KEMX
1.7%

Energy

EPIN
5.1%
KEMX
4.8%

Consumer Defensive

EPIN
2.6%
KEMX
3.0%

Communication Services

EPIN
1.2%
KEMX
3.2%

Real Estate

EPIN

-

KEMX
1.2%

Utilities

EPIN

-

KEMX
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EPIN vs. KEMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EPIN

KEMX
KEMX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
KEMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KEMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
KEMX Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
KEMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
KEMX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPIN vs. KEMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor International Equity ETF (EPIN) and KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF (KEMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

EPIN vs. KEMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EPINKEMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.50

0.67

+1.83

Drawdowns

EPIN vs. KEMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPIN drawdown since its inception was -11.64%, smaller than the maximum KEMX drawdown of -38.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPIN and KEMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EPINKEMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.64%

-38.80%

+27.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.94%

-2.52%

+1.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.76%

-8.85%

+7.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.85%

Volatility

EPIN vs. KEMX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EPINKEMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.35%

22.44%

-5.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.35%

18.21%

-0.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.35%

20.94%

-3.59%

EPIN vs. KEMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPIN has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than KEMX's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

EPIN vs. KEMX - Dividend Comparison

EPIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%, less than KEMX's 2.33% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
EPIN
Harbor International Equity ETF
0.63%0.79%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
KEMX
KraneShares MSCI Emerging Markets ex China Index ETF
2.33%3.28%3.39%2.00%4.10%4.79%1.69%2.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


EPIN and KEMX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, KEMX is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

KEMX is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for EPIN.

KEMX has the higher dividend yield at 2.33%, compared with 0.63% for EPIN.

They also come from different issuers: Harbor and CICC. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for EPIN and 0.25% for KEMX.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EPIN and KEMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer