PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EPIN vs. IBIC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EPIN vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor International Equity ETF (EPIN) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPIN achieves a 21.76% return, which is significantly higher than IBIC's 2.33% return.


EPIN

1D
-0.21%
1M
3.18%
YTD
21.76%
6M
21.92%
1Y
37.79%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

IBIC

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.02%
YTD
2.33%
6M
2.35%
1Y
4.40%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPIN vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between EPIN and IBIC is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025

-0.18

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EPIN vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EPIN
EPIN Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
EPIN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPIN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPIN Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
EPIN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPIN Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIC
IBIC Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
IBIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIC Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIC Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPIN vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor International Equity ETF (EPIN) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


EPINIBICDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

2.21

-0.84

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.26

16.49

-13.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.22

57.80

-45.57

EPIN vs. IBIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPIN Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is lower than the IBIC Sharpe Ratio of 4.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPIN and IBIC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

EPIN vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPIN drawdown since its inception was -11.64%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPIN and IBIC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EPINIBICDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.64%

-0.90%

-10.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.64%

-0.27%

-11.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.18%

-0.17%

-3.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.81%

-0.10%

-1.71%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.10%

0.08%

+3.02%

Volatility

EPIN vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison

Harbor International Equity ETF (EPIN) has a higher volatility of 8.48% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.19%. This indicates that EPIN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EPINIBICDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.48%

0.19%

+8.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.57%

0.67%

+15.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.66%

0.90%

+17.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.42%

1.56%

+16.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.42%

1.56%

+16.86%

EPIN vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPIN has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

EPIN vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison

EPIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than IBIC's 3.59% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
EPIN
Harbor International Equity ETF
0.65%0.79%0.00%0.00%
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
3.59%4.43%4.65%0.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


EPIN and IBIC have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EPIN has higher volatility (8.48%) compared to IBIC (0.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPIN dropped -11.64% vs IBIC's -0.90%.

On 1-year performance, EPIN leads with 37.79% vs 4.40% for IBIC. On fees, IBIC is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, EPIN has performed better with a 37.79% return vs 4.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IBIC is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for EPIN.

IBIC has the higher dividend yield at 3.59%, compared with 0.65% for EPIN.

EPIN is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Harbor and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for EPIN and 0.10% for IBIC.

IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.95 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EPIN and IBIC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer