EPHE vs. EWS
EPHE (iShares MSCI Philippines ETF) and EWS (iShares MSCI Singapore ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds from iShares - EPHE tracks the MSCI Philippines Investable Market Index while EWS tracks the MSCI Singapore Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, EPHE returned -3.20%/yr vs 7.91%/yr for EWS. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EPHE charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for EWS.
Performance
EPHE vs. EWS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EPHE achieves a -1.12% return, which is significantly lower than EWS's 8.22% return. Over the past 10 years, EPHE has underperformed EWS with an annualized return of -3.20%, while EWS has yielded a comparatively higher 7.91% annualized return.
EPHE
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 1.36%
- YTD
- -1.12%
- 6M
- 0.64%
- 1Y
- -9.52%
- 3Y*
- 0.24%
- 5Y*
- -3.12%
- 10Y*
- -3.20%
EWS
- 1D
- -0.70%
- 1M
- 4.60%
- YTD
- 8.22%
- 6M
- 8.37%
- 1Y
- 19.41%
- 3Y*
- 21.86%
- 5Y*
- 9.39%
- 10Y*
- 7.91%
EPHE vs. EWS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPHE iShares MSCI Philippines ETF | -1.12% | 1.56% | -1.41% | 1.27% | -15.87% | -2.23% | -3.95% | 8.50% | -17.50% | 20.20% |
EWS iShares MSCI Singapore ETF | 8.22% | 31.35% | 22.10% | 6.15% | -9.80% | 5.47% | -8.47% | 14.54% | -11.34% | 34.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between EPHE and EWS is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2010 | 0.49 |
The correlation between EPHE and EWS shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.49 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
EPHE vs. EWS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
EPHE
EWS
Industrials
Financial Services
Utilities
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
Healthcare
-
-
Technology
-
Industrials
EPHE
EWS
Financial Services
EPHE
EWS
Utilities
EPHE
EWS
Consumer Cyclical
EPHE
EWS
Real Estate
EPHE
EWS
Communication Services
EPHE
EWS
Consumer Defensive
EPHE
EWS
Energy
EPHE
EWS
-
Basic Materials
EPHE
EWS
-
Healthcare
EPHE
-
EWS
-
Technology
EPHE
-
EWS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EPHE vs. EWS — Risk / Return Rank
EPHE
EWS
EPHE vs. EWS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Philippines ETF (EPHE) and iShares MSCI Singapore ETF (EWS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| EPHE | EWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.51 | 1.32 | -1.83 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.62 | 1.96 | -2.58 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.93 | 1.24 | -0.30 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.59 | 2.49 | -3.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.05 | 6.08 | -7.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| EPHE | EWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.51 | 1.32 | -1.83 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.17 | 0.55 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.14 | 0.44 | -0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | 0.15 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
EPHE vs. EWS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EPHE drawdown since its inception was -53.82%, smaller than the maximum EWS drawdown of -75.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPHE and EWS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EPHE | EWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.82% | -75.00% | +21.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.22% | -7.82% | -8.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.42% | -16.34% | -5.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.96% | -29.06% | -3.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -51.62% | -40.84% | -10.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -34.62% | -0.70% | -33.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.98% | -21.88% | +0.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.08% | 3.20% | +5.88% |
Volatility
EPHE vs. EWS - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Philippines ETF (EPHE) has a higher volatility of 5.60% compared to iShares MSCI Singapore ETF (EWS) at 3.68%. This indicates that EPHE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EWS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EPHE | EWS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.60% | 3.68% | +1.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.77% | 11.45% | +2.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.87% | 14.73% | +4.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.05% | 17.25% | +0.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.24% | 18.03% | +4.21% |
EPHE vs. EWS - Expense Ratio Comparison
EPHE has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than EWS's 0.50% expense ratio.
Dividends
EPHE vs. EWS - Dividend Comparison
EPHE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, less than EWS's 3.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPHE iShares MSCI Philippines ETF | 2.13% | 2.11% | 2.32% | 2.01% | 1.73% | 1.05% | 0.72% | 0.78% | 0.45% | 0.36% | 0.71% | 1.03% |
EWS iShares MSCI Singapore ETF | 3.79% | 4.10% | 4.28% | 6.50% | 2.56% | 6.00% | 2.68% | 4.70% | 4.21% | 3.46% | 3.96% | 4.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EPHE and EWS have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EPHE has higher volatility (5.60%) compared to EWS (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPHE dropped -53.82% vs EWS's -75.00%.
On 10-year performance, EWS leads with 7.91% vs -3.20% for EPHE. On fees, EWS is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, EWS has been the lower-risk option at 3.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EWS has performed better with a 7.91% return vs -3.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EWS is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for EPHE.
EWS has the higher dividend yield at 3.79%, compared with 2.13% for EPHE.
EPHE tracks MSCI Philippines Investable Market Index, while EWS tracks MSCI Singapore Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for EPHE and 0.50% for EWS.
EWS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EPHE and EWS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer