PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EPHE vs. EIDO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EPHE vs. EIDO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Philippines ETF (EPHE) and iShares MSCI Indonesia ETF (EIDO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPHE achieves a -1.12% return, which is significantly higher than EIDO's -34.87% return. Over the past 10 years, EPHE has outperformed EIDO with an annualized return of -3.20%, while EIDO has yielded a comparatively lower -3.97% annualized return.


EPHE

1D
0.24%
1M
1.36%
YTD
-1.12%
6M
0.64%
1Y
-9.52%
3Y*
0.24%
5Y*
-3.12%
10Y*
-3.20%

EIDO

1D
-4.99%
1M
-17.26%
YTD
-34.87%
6M
-34.69%
1Y
-31.45%
3Y*
-16.90%
5Y*
-8.84%
10Y*
-3.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPHE vs. EIDO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
EPHE
iShares MSCI Philippines ETF
-1.12%1.56%-1.41%1.27%-15.87%-2.23%-3.95%8.50%-17.50%20.20%
EIDO
iShares MSCI Indonesia ETF
-34.87%4.90%-13.02%2.56%-0.16%-0.60%-7.13%5.30%-10.88%19.40%

Correlation

The correlation between EPHE and EIDO is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2010

0.53

The correlation between EPHE and EIDO shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (1 year) to 0.53 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

EPHE vs. EIDO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EPHE
EIDO

Industrials

32.0%
6.1%

Financial Services

17.3%
37.8%

Utilities

14.3%
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

13.6%
1.6%

Real Estate

10.7%
1.8%

Communication Services

5.3%
8.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.6%
7.5%

Energy

1.3%
10.6%

Basic Materials

1.0%
18.5%

Healthcare

-

2.4%

Technology

-

2.7%

Industrials

EPHE
32.0%
EIDO
6.1%

Financial Services

EPHE
17.3%
EIDO
37.8%

Utilities

EPHE
14.3%
EIDO
2.4%

Consumer Cyclical

EPHE
13.6%
EIDO
1.6%

Real Estate

EPHE
10.7%
EIDO
1.8%

Communication Services

EPHE
5.3%
EIDO
8.7%

Consumer Defensive

EPHE
4.6%
EIDO
7.5%

Energy

EPHE
1.3%
EIDO
10.6%

Basic Materials

EPHE
1.0%
EIDO
18.5%

Healthcare

EPHE

-

EIDO
2.4%

Technology

EPHE

-

EIDO
2.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EPHE vs. EIDO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EPHE
EPHE Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
EPHE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPHE Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPHE Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
EPHE Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPHE Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

EIDO
EIDO Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
EIDO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 00
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EIDO Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
EIDO Omega Ratio Rank: 00
Omega Ratio Rank
EIDO Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
EIDO Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPHE vs. EIDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Philippines ETF (EPHE) and iShares MSCI Indonesia ETF (EIDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EPHEEIDODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.51

-1.41

+0.91

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.62

-1.96

+1.34

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.93

0.75

+0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.59

-0.86

+0.27

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-1.05

-2.63

+1.58

EPHE vs. EIDO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPHE Sharpe Ratio is -0.51, which is higher than the EIDO Sharpe Ratio of -1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPHE and EIDO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EPHEEIDODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.51

-1.41

+0.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.17

-0.45

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.14

-0.16

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.05

-0.06

+0.11

Drawdowns

EPHE vs. EIDO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPHE drawdown since its inception was -53.82%, smaller than the maximum EIDO drawdown of -63.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPHE and EIDO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EPHEEIDODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.82%

-63.21%

+9.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.22%

-36.63%

+20.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.42%

-45.60%

+24.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.96%

-45.60%

+12.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.62%

-59.41%

+7.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.62%

-55.54%

+20.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.98%

-24.63%

+3.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.08%

11.98%

-2.90%

Volatility

EPHE vs. EIDO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Philippines ETF (EPHE) is 5.60%, while iShares MSCI Indonesia ETF (EIDO) has a volatility of 7.47%. This indicates that EPHE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EIDO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EPHEEIDODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.60%

7.47%

-1.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.77%

18.22%

-4.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.87%

22.35%

-3.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.05%

19.77%

-1.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.24%

24.77%

-2.53%

EPHE vs. EIDO - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both EPHE and EIDO have an expense ratio of 0.59%.


Dividends

EPHE vs. EIDO - Dividend Comparison

EPHE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%, less than EIDO's 5.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EIDO
iShares MSCI Indonesia ETF
5.46%3.56%5.20%2.94%2.53%1.33%1.51%1.78%1.99%1.26%1.16%1.67%
EPHE
iShares MSCI Philippines ETF
2.13%2.11%2.32%2.01%1.73%1.05%0.72%0.78%0.45%0.36%0.71%1.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


EPHE and EIDO have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EIDO has higher volatility (7.47%) compared to EPHE (5.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPHE dropped -53.82% vs EIDO's -63.21%.

On 10-year performance, EPHE leads with -3.20% vs -3.97% for EIDO. Both ETFs have the same 0.59% expense ratio. On volatility, EPHE has been the lower-risk option at 5.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EPHE has performed better with a -3.20% return vs -3.97%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EPHE and EIDO have the same expense ratio: 0.59% per year.

EIDO has the higher dividend yield at 5.46%, compared with 2.13% for EPHE.

EPHE tracks MSCI Philippines Investable Market Index, while EIDO tracks MSCI Indonesia Investable Market Index.

EPHE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.51 vs -1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EPHE and EIDO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer