EPGFX vs. BGEIX

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

EPGFX (EuroPac Gold Fund) and BGEIX (American Century Global Gold Fund) are both Gold funds. Over the past 10 years, EPGFX returned 9.89%/yr vs 11.32%/yr for BGEIX. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EPGFX charges 1.40%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for BGEIX.

Performance

EPGFX vs. BGEIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in EuroPac Gold Fund (EPGFX) and American Century Global Gold Fund (BGEIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPGFX achieves a -9.32% return, which is significantly higher than BGEIX's -13.04% return. Over the past 10 years, EPGFX has underperformed BGEIX with an annualized return of 9.89%, while BGEIX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.32% annualized return.

EPGFX

• 1D: -3.97%
• 1M: -14.10%
• YTD: -9.32%
• 6M: -12.59%
• 1Y: 43.03%
• 3Y*: 30.83%
• 5Y*: 12.35%
• 10Y*: 9.89%

BGEIX

• 1D: -4.14%
• 1M: -16.05%
• YTD: -13.04%
• 6M: -16.49%
• 1Y: 45.03%
• 3Y*: 39.96%
• 5Y*: 18.11%
• 10Y*: 11.32%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPGFX vs. BGEIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
EPGFX EuroPac Gold Fund	-9.32%	129.06%	8.51%	2.31%	-14.00%	-18.06%	36.99%	37.25%	-13.85%	12.73%
BGEIX American Century Global Gold Fund	-13.04%	158.45%	15.10%	7.52%	-12.54%	-8.85%	18.92%	37.82%	-7.43%	10.62%

Correlation

The correlation between EPGFX and BGEIX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014	0.94

The correlation between EPGFX and BGEIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

EPGFX vs. BGEIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EPGFX

EPGFX Risk / Return Rank: 20
EPGFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
EPGFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 19
EPGFX Omega Ratio Rank: 23
EPGFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
EPGFX Martin Ratio Rank: 17

BGEIX

BGEIX Risk / Return Rank: 18
BGEIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
BGEIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
BGEIX Omega Ratio Rank: 21
BGEIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
BGEIX Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPGFX vs. BGEIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for EuroPac Gold Fund (EPGFX) and American Century Global Gold Fund (BGEIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EPGFX	BGEIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.08	1.00	+0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.48	1.44	+0.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.20	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.42	1.24	+0.18
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.66	3.29	+0.37

EPGFX vs. BGEIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EPGFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is comparable to the BGEIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EPGFX and BGEIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EPGFX vs. BGEIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPGFX drawdown since its inception was -56.70%, smaller than the maximum BGEIX drawdown of -78.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPGFX and BGEIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	EPGFX	BGEIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-56.70%	-78.69%	+21.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-30.85%	-36.12%	+5.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.85%	-36.12%	+5.27%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.99%	-46.62%	+1.63%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-51.03%	-51.92%	+0.89%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-30.85%	-35.06%	+4.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.04%	-35.14%	+13.10%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.93%	13.58%	-1.65%

Volatility

EPGFX vs. BGEIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for EuroPac Gold Fund (EPGFX) is 15.11%, while American Century Global Gold Fund (BGEIX) has a volatility of 17.09%. This indicates that EPGFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BGEIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EPGFX	BGEIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	15.11%	17.09%	-1.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	34.19%	37.84%	-3.65%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.65%	44.89%	-4.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.93%	34.16%	-1.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.61%	33.51%	-0.90%

EPGFX vs. BGEIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPGFX has a 1.40% expense ratio, which is higher than BGEIX's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

EPGFX vs. BGEIX - Dividend Comparison

EPGFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.56%, more than BGEIX's 0.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BGEIX American Century Global Gold Fund	0.93%	0.85%	1.36%	1.56%	1.38%	2.13%	0.56%	0.87%	0.00%	0.00%	10.56%
EPGFX EuroPac Gold Fund	7.56%	6.86%	10.36%	0.00%	0.00%	2.49%	8.67%	0.00%	0.00%	2.56%	19.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EPGFX and BGEIX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, EPGFX and BGEIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, EPGFX or BGEIX?

BGEIX has higher volatility (17.09%) compared to EPGFX (15.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EPGFX dropped -56.70% vs BGEIX's -78.69%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EPGFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.08 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.