PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EPEM vs. GDIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EPEM vs. GDIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EPEM) and Harbor Dividend Growth Leaders ETF (GDIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EPEM achieves a 28.50% return, which is significantly higher than GDIV's 11.70% return.


EPEM

1D
-0.80%
1M
4.68%
YTD
28.50%
6M
31.04%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GDIV

1D
0.30%
1M
2.77%
YTD
11.70%
6M
11.92%
1Y
24.86%
3Y*
17.25%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPEM vs. GDIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
EPEM
Harbor Emerging Markets Equity ETF
28.50%20.76%
GDIV
Harbor Dividend Growth Leaders ETF
11.70%12.25%

Correlation

The correlation between EPEM and GDIV is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2025

0.60

EPEM vs. GDIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EPEM
GDIV

Technology

39.4%
23.4%

Financial Services

22.7%
18.2%

Consumer Cyclical

8.5%
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

7.0%
7.4%

Basic Materials

6.5%
1.4%

Communication Services

6.0%

-

Energy

3.6%
5.0%

Industrials

3.1%
16.2%

Healthcare

2.1%
14.4%

Real Estate

1.3%
1.1%

Utilities

-

4.1%

Technology

EPEM
39.4%
GDIV
23.4%

Financial Services

EPEM
22.7%
GDIV
18.2%

Consumer Cyclical

EPEM
8.5%
GDIV
8.9%

Consumer Defensive

EPEM
7.0%
GDIV
7.4%

Basic Materials

EPEM
6.5%
GDIV
1.4%

Communication Services

EPEM
6.0%
GDIV

-

Energy

EPEM
3.6%
GDIV
5.0%

Industrials

EPEM
3.1%
GDIV
16.2%

Healthcare

EPEM
2.1%
GDIV
14.4%

Real Estate

EPEM
1.3%
GDIV
1.1%

Utilities

EPEM

-

GDIV
4.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EPEM vs. GDIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EPEM

GDIV
GDIV Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
GDIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDIV Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
GDIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDIV Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPEM vs. GDIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EPEM) and Harbor Dividend Growth Leaders ETF (GDIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

EPEM vs. GDIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EPEMGDIVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.88

0.85

+2.04

Drawdowns

EPEM vs. GDIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPEM drawdown since its inception was -13.27%, smaller than the maximum GDIV drawdown of -18.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPEM and GDIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EPEMGDIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.27%

-18.93%

+5.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.48%

0.00%

-2.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.96%

-3.18%

+1.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.32%

Volatility

EPEM vs. GDIV - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EPEMGDIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.36%

11.87%

+7.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.36%

15.31%

+4.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.36%

15.31%

+4.05%

EPEM vs. GDIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPEM has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than GDIV's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

EPEM vs. GDIV - Dividend Comparison

EPEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%, more than GDIV's 1.13% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
EPEM
Harbor Emerging Markets Equity ETF
2.85%3.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GDIV
Harbor Dividend Growth Leaders ETF
1.13%1.19%1.30%2.27%5.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


EPEM and GDIV have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GDIV is cheaper at 0.50% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GDIV is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.84% for EPEM.

EPEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.85%, compared with 1.13% for GDIV.

EPEM is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while GDIV is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.84% for EPEM and 0.50% for GDIV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EPEM and GDIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer