PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EPEM vs. DFEV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EPEM vs. DFEV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EPEM) and Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF (DFEV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with EPEM having a 29.54% return and DFEV slightly lower at 29.46%.


EPEM

1D
-1.69%
1M
7.99%
YTD
29.54%
6M
31.79%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

DFEV

1D
-1.36%
1M
9.10%
YTD
29.46%
6M
32.40%
1Y
57.15%
3Y*
25.84%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EPEM vs. DFEV - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between EPEM and DFEV is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2025

0.88

EPEM vs. DFEV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EPEM
DFEV

Technology

39.4%
28.6%

Financial Services

22.7%
16.8%

Consumer Cyclical

8.5%
10.5%

Consumer Defensive

7.0%
3.4%

Basic Materials

6.5%
7.4%

Communication Services

6.0%
3.5%

Energy

3.6%
7.6%

Industrials

3.1%
9.8%

Healthcare

2.1%
3.3%

Real Estate

1.3%
1.6%

Utilities

-

0.8%

Technology

EPEM
39.4%
DFEV
28.6%

Financial Services

EPEM
22.7%
DFEV
16.8%

Consumer Cyclical

EPEM
8.5%
DFEV
10.5%

Consumer Defensive

EPEM
7.0%
DFEV
3.4%

Basic Materials

EPEM
6.5%
DFEV
7.4%

Communication Services

EPEM
6.0%
DFEV
3.5%

Energy

EPEM
3.6%
DFEV
7.6%

Industrials

EPEM
3.1%
DFEV
9.8%

Healthcare

EPEM
2.1%
DFEV
3.3%

Real Estate

EPEM
1.3%
DFEV
1.6%

Utilities

EPEM

-

DFEV
0.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EPEM vs. DFEV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EPEM

DFEV
DFEV Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
DFEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFEV Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
DFEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFEV Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EPEM vs. DFEV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Emerging Markets Equity ETF (EPEM) and Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF (DFEV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

EPEM vs. DFEV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EPEMDFEVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.96

1.11

+1.85

Drawdowns

EPEM vs. DFEV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EPEM drawdown since its inception was -13.27%, smaller than the maximum DFEV drawdown of -18.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPEM and DFEV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EPEMDFEVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.27%

-18.49%

+5.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.69%

-1.36%

-0.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.96%

-4.65%

+2.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.01%

Volatility

EPEM vs. DFEV - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EPEMDFEVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.37%

17.31%

+2.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.37%

16.42%

+2.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.37%

16.42%

+2.95%

EPEM vs. DFEV - Expense Ratio Comparison

EPEM has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than DFEV's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

EPEM vs. DFEV - Dividend Comparison

EPEM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, more than DFEV's 2.02% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
DFEV
Dimensional Emerging Markets Value ETF
2.02%2.69%3.17%3.47%3.35%
EPEM
Harbor Emerging Markets Equity ETF
2.83%3.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EPEM and DFEV have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DFEV is cheaper at 0.43% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DFEV is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.84% for EPEM.

EPEM has the higher dividend yield at 2.83%, compared with 2.02% for DFEV.

They also come from different issuers: Harbor and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.84% for EPEM and 0.43% for DFEV.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EPEM and DFEV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer