EPAI vs. QRFT
EPAI (Harbor AI Inflection Strategy ETF) and QRFT (QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - EPAI is a Technology Equities fund actively managed by Harbor, while QRFT is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Exchange Traded Concepts. Both are actively managed. Their 0.77 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. EPAI charges 0.88%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for QRFT.
Performance
EPAI vs. QRFT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EPAI achieves a 32.94% return, which is significantly higher than QRFT's 11.89% return.
EPAI
- 1D
- 1.72%
- 1M
- -6.62%
- 6M
- 17.87%
- YTD
- 32.94%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
QRFT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 1.66%
- 6M
- 10.07%
- YTD
- 11.89%
- 1Y
- 22.68%
- 3Y*
- 19.37%
- 5Y*
- 10.62%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.79%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $21.05K | $19.63K | $29.61K | |
| $1.12M | $598.10K | $292.56K |
EPAI vs. QRFT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
EPAI Harbor AI Inflection Strategy ETF | 32.94% | -0.33% |
QRFT QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF | 11.89% | 2.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between EPAI and QRFT is 0.77, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 18, 2025 | 0.77 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EPAI vs. QRFT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor AI Inflection Strategy ETF (EPAI) and QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF (QRFT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EPAI | QRFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.27 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.32 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 9.58 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EPAI vs. QRFT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EPAI drawdown since its inception was -23.61%, smaller than the maximum QRFT drawdown of -30.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EPAI and QRFT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EPAI | QRFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -23.61% | -30.19% | +6.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.12% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.51% | -0.97% | -15.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.34% | -6.70% | +2.36% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.21% | — |
Volatility
EPAI vs. QRFT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EPAI | QRFT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.99% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.98% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.83% | 14.06% | +22.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.83% | 17.47% | +19.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 36.83% | 20.04% | +16.79% |
EPAI vs. QRFT - Expense Ratio Comparison
EPAI has a 0.88% expense ratio, which is higher than QRFT's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
EPAI vs. QRFT - Dividend Comparison
Neither EPAI nor QRFT has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EPAI Harbor AI Inflection Strategy ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QRFT QRAFT AI Enhanced U.S. Large Cap ETF | 0.27% | 0.27% | 0.52% | 0.77% | 0.83% | 0.05% | 1.81% | 4.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EPAI and QRFT have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QRFT is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QRFT is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for EPAI.
QRFT has the higher dividend yield at 0.27%, compared with 0.00% for EPAI.
EPAI is categorized as Technology Equities, while QRFT is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Harbor and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.88% for EPAI and 0.75% for QRFT.
Find the right allocation for EPAI and QRFT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer