PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ENZL vs. EWM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ENZL vs. EWM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ENZL (iShares MSCI New Zealand ETF) and EWM (iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds from iShares - ENZL tracks the MSCI New Zealand Investable Market Index while EWM tracks the MSCI Malaysia Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ENZL returned 3.34%/yr vs 2.59%/yr for EWM. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ENZL charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for EWM.

Performance

ENZL vs. EWM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI New Zealand ETF (ENZL) and iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF (EWM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ENZL achieves a -0.60% return, which is significantly lower than EWM's 2.45% return. Over the past 10 years, ENZL has outperformed EWM with an annualized return of 3.34%, while EWM has yielded a comparatively lower 2.59% annualized return.

ENZL

1D
-1.64%
1M
0.88%
YTD
-0.60%
6M
-1.29%
1Y
3.15%
3Y*
-0.29%
5Y*
-4.24%
10Y*
3.34%

EWM

1D
-2.37%
1M
-5.11%
YTD
2.45%
6M
6.54%
1Y
20.74%
3Y*
14.49%
5Y*
4.53%
10Y*
2.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ENZL vs. EWM - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ENZL
iShares MSCI New Zealand ETF		-0.60%2.47%-4.86%2.95%-16.18%-11.39%20.04%30.09%0.35%24.04%
EWM
iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF		2.45%15.74%19.46%-3.61%-6.00%-7.40%3.12%-1.41%-6.28%24.25%

Correlation

The correlation between ENZL and EWM is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 3, 2010

0.46

ENZL vs. EWM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
ENZL
EWM

Utilities

29.0%
10.8%

Healthcare

26.1%
3.8%

Industrials

19.0%
11.1%

Real Estate

12.6%

-

Basic Materials

3.8%
8.9%

Communication Services

3.7%
6.6%

Energy

2.0%
3.9%

Financial Services

1.4%
46.6%

Consumer Cyclical

0.9%
1.1%

Consumer Defensive

0.8%
7.3%

Technology

0.6%

-

Utilities

ENZL
29.0%
EWM
10.8%

Healthcare

ENZL
26.1%
EWM
3.8%

Industrials

ENZL
19.0%
EWM
11.1%

Real Estate

ENZL
12.6%
EWM

-

Basic Materials

ENZL
3.8%
EWM
8.9%

Communication Services

ENZL
3.7%
EWM
6.6%

Energy

ENZL
2.0%
EWM
3.9%

Financial Services

ENZL
1.4%
EWM
46.6%

Consumer Cyclical

ENZL
0.9%
EWM
1.1%

Consumer Defensive

ENZL
0.8%
EWM
7.3%

Technology

ENZL
0.6%
EWM

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI New Zealand ETF

iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF

Often compared with ENZL:
ENZL vs. EIRLENZL vs. EDENENZL vs. MNROENZL vs. IBC6.DEENZL vs. VTIENZL vs. EWQENZL vs. EWA
Often compared with EWM:
EWM vs. EIDOEWM vs. EWYEWM vs. EPIEWM vs. EWTEWM vs. AAXJEWM vs. SCHDEWM vs. VOO

Return for Risk

ENZL vs. EWM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ENZL
ENZL Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
ENZL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1111
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENZL Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENZL Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
ENZL Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENZL Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank
EWM
EWM Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
EWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWM Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
EWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWM Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ENZL vs. EWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI New Zealand ETF (ENZL) and iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF (EWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

ENZLEWMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.20
1.49

-1.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.39
2.09

-1.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.26

-0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.25

2.65

-2.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.70

8.22

-7.53

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ENZL vs. EWM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ENZL Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is lower than the EWM Sharpe Ratio of 1.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ENZL and EWM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

ENZLEWMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

1.49

-1.29

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.23

0.33

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.16

0.16

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.07

+0.30

Drawdowns

ENZL vs. EWM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENZL drawdown since its inception was -42.44%, smaller than the maximum EWM drawdown of -89.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENZL and EWM.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ENZLEWMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.44%

-89.19%

+46.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.90%

-7.86%

-5.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.67%

-21.31%

+0.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-36.86%

-22.76%

-14.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.44%

-43.81%

+1.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-29.65%

-9.46%

-20.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.78%

-31.82%

+19.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.54%

2.53%

+2.01%

Volatility

ENZL vs. EWM - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI New Zealand ETF (ENZL) has a higher volatility of 6.01% compared to iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF (EWM) at 4.15%. This indicates that ENZL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ENZLEWMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.01%

4.15%

+1.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.02%

10.86%

+2.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.97%

13.99%

+1.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.59%

13.70%

+4.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.44%

16.29%

+4.15%

ENZL vs. EWM - Expense Ratio Comparison

ENZL has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than EWM's 0.49% expense ratio.

Dividends

ENZL vs. EWM - Dividend Comparison

ENZL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.25%, less than EWM's 3.33% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ENZL
iShares MSCI New Zealand ETF		2.25%2.23%2.13%3.00%1.62%2.46%1.66%3.35%3.60%3.69%4.79%4.29%
EWM
iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF		3.33%3.41%3.32%3.47%3.00%6.48%1.89%2.91%3.84%5.58%5.97%37.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

ENZL and EWM have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ENZL has higher volatility (6.01%) compared to EWM (4.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ENZL dropped -42.44% vs EWM's -89.19%.

On 10-year performance, ENZL leads with 3.34% vs 2.59% for EWM. On fees, EWM is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, EWM has been the lower-risk option at 4.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ENZL has performed better with a 3.34% return vs 2.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EWM is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for ENZL.

EWM has the higher dividend yield at 3.33%, compared with 2.25% for ENZL.

ENZL tracks MSCI New Zealand Investable Market Index, while EWM tracks MSCI Malaysia Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for ENZL and 0.49% for EWM.

EWM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ENZL and EWM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer