EWM vs. VOO
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF (EWM) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO).
EWM and VOO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EWM is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Malaysia Index. It was launched on Mar 12, 1996. VOO is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Index. It was launched on Sep 7, 2010. Both EWM and VOO are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EWM or VOO.
Key characteristics
| EWM | VOO | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 4.14% | 5.63% |
| 1Y Return | 4.78% | 23.68% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -3.27% | 7.89% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -2.27% | 13.12% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | -3.55% | 12.38% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.51 | 1.91 |
| Daily Std Dev | 10.46% | 11.70% |
| Max Drawdown | -89.19% | -33.99% |
| Current Drawdown | -33.44% | -4.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between EWM and VOO is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
EWM vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, EWM achieves a 4.14% return, which is significantly lower than VOO's 5.63% return. Over the past 10 years, EWM has underperformed VOO with an annualized return of -3.55%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively higher 12.38% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EWM vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
EWM has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EWM vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF (EWM) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EWM vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison
EWM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.33%, more than VOO's 1.39% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWM iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF | 3.33% | 3.47% | 3.00% | 6.48% | 1.89% | 2.91% | 3.84% | 5.58% | 5.97% | 37.54% | 4.03% | 3.03% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 1.39% | 1.46% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.88% | 2.06% | 1.78% | 2.02% | 2.10% | 1.85% | 1.84% |
Drawdowns
EWM vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EWM drawdown since its inception was -89.19%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EWM and VOO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EWM vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF (EWM) is 3.12%, while Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) has a volatility of 3.89%. This indicates that EWM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.