ENZL vs. EEMA

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI New Zealand ETF (ENZL) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF (EEMA).

ENZL and EEMA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ENZL is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI New Zealand Investable Market Index. It was launched on Sep 1, 2010. EEMA is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Asia Index. It was launched on Feb 8, 2012. Both ENZL and EEMA are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

ENZL vs. EEMA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI New Zealand ETF (ENZL) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF (EEMA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ENZL vs. EEMA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ENZL iShares MSCI New Zealand ETF	-6.02%	2.47%	-4.86%	2.95%	-16.18%	-11.39%	20.04%	30.09%	0.35%	24.04%
EEMA iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF	2.55%	33.27%	10.23%	6.57%	-21.49%	-4.22%	25.17%	18.60%	-15.76%	43.41%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ENZL achieves a -6.02% return, which is significantly lower than EEMA's 2.55% return. Over the past 10 years, ENZL has underperformed EEMA with an annualized return of 3.31%, while EEMA has yielded a comparatively higher 8.40% annualized return.

ENZL

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: -9.70%
• YTD: -6.02%
• 6M: -7.76%
• 1Y: 2.63%
• 3Y*: -2.84%
• 5Y*: -5.22%
• 10Y*: 3.31%

EEMA

• 1D: 0.72%
• 1M: -7.88%
• YTD: 2.55%
• 6M: 5.40%
• 1Y: 32.15%
• 3Y*: 15.23%
• 5Y*: 2.99%
• 10Y*: 8.40%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ENZL vs. EEMA - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ENZL and EEMA have an expense ratio of 0.50%.

ENZL

iShares MSCI New Zealand ETF

EEMA

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF

Return for Risk

ENZL vs. EEMA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ENZL

ENZL Risk / Return Rank: 16
ENZL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
ENZL Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
ENZL Omega Ratio Rank: 14
ENZL Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
ENZL Martin Ratio Rank: 18

EEMA

EEMA Risk / Return Rank: 78
EEMA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
EEMA Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
EEMA Omega Ratio Rank: 77
EEMA Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
EEMA Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ENZL vs. EEMA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI New Zealand ETF (ENZL) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF (EEMA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ENZL	EEMA	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.15	1.52	-1.36
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.33	2.12	-1.79
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	1.30	-0.26
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.26	2.25	-1.99
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.96	8.46	-7.50
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ENZL vs. EEMA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ENZL Sharpe Ratio is 0.15, which is lower than the EEMA Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ENZL and EEMA, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ENZL	EEMA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.15	1.52	-1.36
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.28	0.15	-0.44
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.16	0.41	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.35	0.30	+0.06

Correlation

The correlation between ENZL and EEMA is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

ENZL vs. EEMA - Dividend Comparison

ENZL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.38%, more than EEMA's 1.44% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ENZL iShares MSCI New Zealand ETF	2.38%	2.23%	2.13%	3.00%	1.62%	2.46%	1.66%	3.35%	3.60%	3.69%	4.79%	4.29%
EEMA iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF	1.44%	1.48%	1.74%	2.02%	1.78%	2.19%	1.15%	1.86%	2.17%	1.74%	1.74%	2.44%

Drawdowns

ENZL vs. EEMA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENZL drawdown since its inception was -42.44%, roughly equal to the maximum EEMA drawdown of -44.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENZL and EEMA.

Drawdown Indicators

	ENZL	EEMA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.44%	-44.18%	+1.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.90%	-14.30%	+1.40%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.18%	-40.87%	+3.69%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.44%	-44.18%	+1.74%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-33.49%	-10.61%	-22.88%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.59%	-14.11%	+1.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.53%	3.81%	-0.28%

Volatility

ENZL vs. EEMA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI New Zealand ETF (ENZL) is 6.86%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Asia ETF (EEMA) has a volatility of 9.12%. This indicates that ENZL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEMA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ENZL	EEMA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.86%	9.12%	-2.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.40%	15.25%	-3.85%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.39%	21.31%	-3.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.45%	19.94%	-1.49%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.38%	20.65%	-0.27%