ENVB vs. SCHG
ENVB (Enveric Biosciences Inc) is a stock, while SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Over the past 10 years, ENVB returned -74.86%/yr vs 18.85%/yr for SCHG. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ENVB vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ENVB achieves a -59.23% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 5.03% return. Over the past 10 years, ENVB has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of -74.86%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.85% annualized return.
ENVB
- 1D
- -3.27%
- 1M
- -34.22%
- YTD
- -59.23%
- 6M
- -72.39%
- 1Y
- -89.81%
- 3Y*
- -87.52%
- 5Y*
- -85.10%
- 10Y*
- -74.86%
SCHG
- 1D
- 2.39%
- 1M
- -0.12%
- YTD
- 5.03%
- 6M
- 5.98%
- 1Y
- 23.20%
- 3Y*
- 23.27%
- 5Y*
- 14.85%
- 10Y*
- 18.85%
ENVB vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENVB Enveric Biosciences Inc | -59.23% | -94.37% | -72.43% | -37.50% | -95.53% | -37.16% | -34.51% | -48.17% | -94.37% | -52.38% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 5.03% | 17.50% | 34.95% | 50.10% | -31.80% | 28.11% | 39.14% | 36.02% | -1.36% | 28.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between ENVB and SCHG is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016 | 0.19 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ENVB vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
ENVB
SCHG
ENVB vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Enveric Biosciences Inc (ENVB) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ENVB | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.26 | -0.39 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.98 | 1.42 | -2.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.34 | 4.68 | -6.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ENVB vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENVB drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENVB and SCHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENVB | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -34.59% | -65.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -91.49% | -16.41% | -75.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -99.81% | -23.39% | -76.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -100.00% | -34.59% | -65.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -100.00% | -34.59% | -65.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -3.06% | -96.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -86.07% | -5.20% | -80.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 66.73% | 4.97% | +61.76% |
Volatility
ENVB vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
Enveric Biosciences Inc (ENVB) has a higher volatility of 21.07% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 5.59%. This indicates that ENVB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ENVB | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 21.07% | 5.59% | +15.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 105.59% | 12.52% | +93.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 175.01% | 16.09% | +158.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 155.96% | 22.35% | +133.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 164.65% | 21.60% | +143.05% |
Dividends
ENVB vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
ENVB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENVB Enveric Biosciences Inc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.37% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ENVB and SCHG have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ENVB has higher volatility (21.07%) compared to SCHG (5.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ENVB dropped -100.00% vs SCHG's -34.59%.
SCHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ENVB and SCHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer