PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ENVB vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ENVB vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Enveric Biosciences Inc (ENVB) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ENVB achieves a -59.23% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 5.03% return. Over the past 10 years, ENVB has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of -74.86%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.85% annualized return.


ENVB

1D
-3.27%
1M
-34.22%
YTD
-59.23%
6M
-72.39%
1Y
-89.81%
3Y*
-87.52%
5Y*
-85.10%
10Y*
-74.86%

SCHG

1D
2.39%
1M
-0.12%
YTD
5.03%
6M
5.98%
1Y
23.20%
3Y*
23.27%
5Y*
14.85%
10Y*
18.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ENVB vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ENVB
Enveric Biosciences Inc
-59.23%-94.37%-72.43%-37.50%-95.53%-37.16%-34.51%-48.17%-94.37%-52.38%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
5.03%17.50%34.95%50.10%-31.80%28.11%39.14%36.02%-1.36%28.05%

Correlation

The correlation between ENVB and SCHG is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.23

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ENVB vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ENVB
ENVB Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
ENVB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENVB Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENVB Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
ENVB Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENVB Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ENVB vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Enveric Biosciences Inc (ENVB) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ENVBSCHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.87

1.26

-0.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.98

1.42

-2.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.34

4.68

-6.03

ENVB vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ENVB Sharpe Ratio is -0.51, which is lower than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ENVB and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ENVB vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENVB drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -34.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENVB and SCHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ENVBSCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-100.00%

-34.59%

-65.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-91.49%

-16.41%

-75.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-99.81%

-23.39%

-76.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-100.00%

-34.59%

-65.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-100.00%

-34.59%

-65.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-100.00%

-3.06%

-96.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-86.07%

-5.20%

-80.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

66.73%

4.97%

+61.76%

Volatility

ENVB vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

Enveric Biosciences Inc (ENVB) has a higher volatility of 21.07% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 5.59%. This indicates that ENVB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ENVBSCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

21.07%

5.59%

+15.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

105.59%

12.52%

+93.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

175.01%

16.09%

+158.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

155.96%

22.35%

+133.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

164.65%

21.60%

+143.05%

Dividends

ENVB vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

ENVB has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SCHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.37%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ENVB
Enveric Biosciences Inc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.37%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


ENVB and SCHG have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ENVB has higher volatility (21.07%) compared to SCHG (5.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ENVB dropped -100.00% vs SCHG's -34.59%.

SCHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs -0.51), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ENVB and SCHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer