ENVA vs. SPMO
ENVA (Enova International, Inc.) is a stock, while SPMO (Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF) is Momentum fund tracking the S&P 500 Momentum Index. Over the past 10 years, ENVA returned 38.77%/yr vs 20.86%/yr for SPMO. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ENVA vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ENVA achieves a 20.44% return, which is significantly lower than SPMO's 28.15% return. Over the past 10 years, ENVA has outperformed SPMO with an annualized return of 38.77%, while SPMO has yielded a comparatively lower 20.86% annualized return.
ENVA
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 13.51%
- YTD
- 20.44%
- 6M
- 16.35%
- 1Y
- 102.88%
- 3Y*
- 53.36%
- 5Y*
- 39.68%
- 10Y*
- 38.77%
SPMO
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- 3.36%
- YTD
- 28.15%
- 6M
- 28.70%
- 1Y
- 44.90%
- 3Y*
- 41.53%
- 5Y*
- 23.50%
- 10Y*
- 20.86%
ENVA vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENVA Enova International, Inc. | 20.44% | 63.95% | 73.19% | 44.28% | -6.32% | 65.36% | 2.95% | 23.64% | 28.03% | 21.12% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 28.15% | 26.58% | 45.82% | 17.56% | -10.45% | 22.64% | 28.25% | 25.93% | -0.92% | 27.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between ENVA and SPMO is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 12, 2015 | 0.34 |
The correlation between ENVA and SPMO shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (all time) to 0.46 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ENVA vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank
ENVA
SPMO
ENVA vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Enova International, Inc. (ENVA) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ENVA | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.36 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.21 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.41 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.04 | 3.44 | +0.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.44 | 13.01 | -2.57 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ENVA vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENVA drawdown since its inception was -84.26%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -30.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENVA and SPMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENVA | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -84.26% | -30.95% | -53.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.75% | -12.70% | -12.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -37.01% | -20.13% | -16.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.84% | -22.74% | -20.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -77.57% | -30.95% | -46.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.14% | -1.68% | +1.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.82% | -4.60% | -27.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.57% | 3.35% | +6.22% |
Volatility
ENVA vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison
Enova International, Inc. (ENVA) has a higher volatility of 11.26% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) at 10.29%. This indicates that ENVA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ENVA | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.26% | 10.29% | +0.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.77% | 16.73% | +12.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.58% | 19.48% | +19.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.33% | 19.65% | +20.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.25% | 20.48% | +28.77% |
Dividends
ENVA vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison
ENVA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.67%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENVA Enova International, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.67% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ENVA and SPMO have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ENVA has higher volatility (11.26%) compared to SPMO (10.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ENVA dropped -84.26% vs SPMO's -30.95%.
ENVA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ENVA and SPMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer