ENT.L vs. SCHG
ENT.L (Entain plc) is a stock, while SCHG (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index. Over the past 10 years, ENT.L returned 1.96%/yr vs 19.40%/yr for SCHG. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ENT.L vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ENT.L is traded in GBp, while SCHG is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SCHG values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ENT.L achieves a -24.19% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 4.63% return. Over the past 10 years, ENT.L has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 1.96%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 19.40% annualized return.
ENT.L
- 1D
- 3.22%
- 1M
- 7.20%
- YTD
- -24.19%
- 6M
- -23.45%
- 1Y
- -20.74%
- 3Y*
- -22.13%
- 5Y*
- -18.45%
- 10Y*
- 1.96%
SCHG
- 1D
- -2.38%
- 1M
- 1.72%
- YTD
- 4.63%
- 6M
- 2.46%
- 1Y
- 23.99%
- 3Y*
- 20.92%
- 5Y*
- 16.35%
- 10Y*
- 19.40%
ENT.L vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENT.L Entain plc | -24.19% | 14.44% | -28.99% | -23.68% | -20.99% | 48.48% | 31.76% | 39.33% | -24.74% | 51.96% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 4.63% | 9.13% | 37.31% | 42.60% | -23.69% | 29.33% | 35.05% | 30.84% | 4.49% | 16.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between ENT.L and SCHG is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2013 | 0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ENT.L vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank
ENT.L
SCHG
ENT.L vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Entain plc (ENT.L) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ENT.L | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.29 | -0.36 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.46 | 1.46 | -1.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.73 | 4.11 | -4.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ENT.L | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.56 | 1.58 | -2.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.47 | 0.78 | -1.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.05 | 0.91 | -0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.26 | 0.91 | -0.66 |
Drawdowns
ENT.L vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENT.L drawdown since its inception was -78.12%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -27.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENT.L and SCHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENT.L | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.12% | -27.53% | -50.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.01% | -16.56% | -30.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.44% | -26.67% | -36.77% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -78.12% | -27.53% | -50.59% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -78.12% | -27.53% | -50.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -73.70% | -3.55% | -70.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -26.73% | -4.76% | -21.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 29.67% | 5.85% | +23.82% |
Volatility
ENT.L vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison
Entain plc (ENT.L) has a higher volatility of 8.50% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 4.17%. This indicates that ENT.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ENT.L | SCHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.50% | 4.17% | +4.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.67% | 10.86% | +18.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.87% | 15.27% | +23.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 39.02% | 21.09% | +17.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.94% | 21.43% | +19.51% |
Dividends
ENT.L vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison
ENT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%, more than SCHG's 0.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENT.L Entain plc | 3.43% | 2.49% | 2.65% | 1.75% | 0.64% | 0.00% | 1.55% | 3.80% | 4.63% | 4.34% | 0.00% | 8.63% |
SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF | 0.37% | 0.36% | 0.39% | 0.46% | 0.55% | 0.42% | 0.52% | 0.82% | 1.27% | 1.01% | 1.04% | 1.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ENT.L and SCHG have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for ENT.L and SCHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer