PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ENT.L vs. SCHG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ENT.L vs. SCHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Entain plc (ENT.L) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ENT.L is traded in GBp, while SCHG is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SCHG values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ENT.L achieves a -24.19% return, which is significantly lower than SCHG's 4.63% return. Over the past 10 years, ENT.L has underperformed SCHG with an annualized return of 1.96%, while SCHG has yielded a comparatively higher 19.40% annualized return.


ENT.L

1D
3.22%
1M
7.20%
YTD
-24.19%
6M
-23.45%
1Y
-20.74%
3Y*
-22.13%
5Y*
-18.45%
10Y*
1.96%

SCHG

1D
-2.38%
1M
1.72%
YTD
4.63%
6M
2.46%
1Y
23.99%
3Y*
20.92%
5Y*
16.35%
10Y*
19.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ENT.L vs. SCHG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ENT.L
Entain plc
-24.19%14.44%-28.99%-23.68%-20.99%48.48%31.76%39.33%-24.74%51.96%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
4.63%9.13%37.31%42.60%-23.69%29.33%35.05%30.84%4.49%16.97%

Correlation

The correlation between ENT.L and SCHG is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2013

0.18

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ENT.L vs. SCHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ENT.L
ENT.L Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
ENT.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENT.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENT.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
ENT.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENT.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHG
SCHG Risk / Return Rank: 3535
Overall Rank
SCHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHG Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHG Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ENT.L vs. SCHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Entain plc (ENT.L) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ENT.LSCHGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.92

1.29

-0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.46

1.46

-1.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.73

4.11

-4.84

ENT.L vs. SCHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ENT.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.56, which is lower than the SCHG Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ENT.L and SCHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ENT.LSCHGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.56

1.58

-2.14

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.47

0.78

-1.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

0.91

-0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.91

-0.66

Drawdowns

ENT.L vs. SCHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENT.L drawdown since its inception was -78.12%, which is greater than SCHG's maximum drawdown of -27.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENT.L and SCHG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ENT.LSCHGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-78.12%

-27.53%

-50.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-47.01%

-16.56%

-30.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.44%

-26.67%

-36.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-78.12%

-27.53%

-50.59%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-78.12%

-27.53%

-50.59%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-73.70%

-3.55%

-70.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.73%

-4.76%

-21.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

29.67%

5.85%

+23.82%

Volatility

ENT.L vs. SCHG - Volatility Comparison

Entain plc (ENT.L) has a higher volatility of 8.50% compared to Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF (SCHG) at 4.17%. This indicates that ENT.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ENT.LSCHGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.50%

4.17%

+4.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.67%

10.86%

+18.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.87%

15.27%

+23.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

39.02%

21.09%

+17.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.94%

21.43%

+19.51%

Dividends

ENT.L vs. SCHG - Dividend Comparison

ENT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%, more than SCHG's 0.37% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ENT.L
Entain plc
3.43%2.49%2.65%1.75%0.64%0.00%1.55%3.80%4.63%4.34%0.00%8.63%
SCHG
Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
0.37%0.36%0.39%0.46%0.55%0.42%0.52%0.82%1.27%1.01%1.04%1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions


ENT.L and SCHG have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ENT.L and SCHG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer