ENPH vs. LSCC
ENPH (Enphase Energy, Inc.) and LSCC (Lattice Semiconductor Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — ENPH in Solar, LSCC in Semiconductors. Over the past 10 years, ENPH returned 35.33%/yr vs 35.59%/yr for LSCC. Their 0.35 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
ENPH vs. LSCC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ENPH achieves a 21.53% return, which is significantly lower than LSCC's 74.38% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ENPH having a 35.33% annualized return and LSCC not far ahead at 35.59%.
ENPH
- 1D
- -6.75%
- 1M
- -12.57%
- 6M
- -24.62%
- YTD
- 21.53%
- 1Y
- 22.06%
- 3Y*
- -34.72%
- 5Y*
- -26.35%
- 10Y*
- 35.33%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.17%
LSCC
- 1D
- -7.02%
- 1M
- -6.55%
- 6M
- 56.88%
- YTD
- 74.38%
- 1Y
- 128.55%
- 3Y*
- 11.45%
- 5Y*
- 15.84%
- 10Y*
- 35.59%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.36%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $227.29M | $189.35M | $372.23M | |
| $298.03M | $248.98M | $285.29M |
ENPH vs. LSCC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENPH Enphase Energy, Inc. | 21.53% | -53.33% | -48.02% | -50.13% | 44.83% | 4.26% | 571.53% | 452.43% | 96.27% | 138.61% |
LSCC Lattice Semiconductor Corporation | 74.38% | 29.89% | -17.89% | 6.33% | -15.81% | 68.18% | 139.39% | 176.59% | 19.72% | -21.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between ENPH and LSCC is 0.45, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.37 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2012 | 0.35 |
The correlation between ENPH and LSCC shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (all time) to 0.47 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
ENPH:
$5.15B
LSCC:
$17.58B
ENPH:
$1.01
LSCC:
$0.26
ENPH:
38.55
LSCC:
489.43
ENPH:
3.89
LSCC:
27.30
ENPH:
4.38
LSCC:
23.51
ENPH:
$1.33B
LSCC:
$651.12M
ENPH:
$623.68M
LSCC:
$440.51M
ENPH:
$203.83M
LSCC:
$66.91M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ENPH vs. LSCC — Risk / Return Rank
ENPH
LSCC
ENPH vs. LSCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH) and Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ENPH | LSCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.65 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.35 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.43 | 4.75 | -4.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.94 | 15.39 | -14.46 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ENPH vs. LSCC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENPH drawdown since its inception was -95.97%, roughly equal to the maximum LSCC drawdown of -97.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENPH and LSCC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENPH | LSCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.97% | -97.34% | +1.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -51.51% | -27.25% | -24.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -81.15% | -61.09% | -20.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -92.23% | -61.09% | -31.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -92.23% | -61.09% | -31.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -88.41% | -17.36% | -71.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -50.93% | -54.95% | +4.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 23.62% | 8.38% | +15.24% |
Volatility
ENPH vs. LSCC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Enphase Energy, Inc. (ENPH) is 19.50%, while Lattice Semiconductor Corporation (LSCC) has a volatility of 22.92%. This indicates that ENPH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LSCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ENPH | LSCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 19.50% | 22.92% | -3.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 69.47% | 49.70% | +19.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 83.32% | 60.66% | +22.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 70.76% | 55.56% | +15.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 78.48% | 51.24% | +27.24% |
Dividends
ENPH vs. LSCC - Dividend Comparison
Neither ENPH nor LSCC has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
ENPH vs. LSCC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Enphase Energy, Inc. and Lattice Semiconductor Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
ENPH vs. LSCC - Profitability Comparison
ENPH - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Enphase Energy, Inc. reported a gross profit of 175.01M and revenue of 291.85M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.0%.
LSCC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lattice Semiconductor Corporation reported a gross profit of 141.33M and revenue of 201.08M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 70.3%.
ENPH - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Enphase Energy, Inc. reported an operating income of 51.52M and revenue of 291.85M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.7%.
LSCC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lattice Semiconductor Corporation reported an operating income of 21.75M and revenue of 201.08M, resulting in an operating margin of 10.8%.
ENPH - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Enphase Energy, Inc. reported a net income of 36.08M and revenue of 291.85M, resulting in a net margin of 12.4%.
LSCC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Lattice Semiconductor Corporation reported a net income of 19.36M and revenue of 201.08M, resulting in a net margin of 9.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
ENPH and LSCC have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
LSCC has higher volatility (22.92%) compared to ENPH (19.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ENPH dropped -95.97% vs LSCC's -97.34%.
LSCC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ENPH and LSCC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer