ENOR vs. FLEE
ENOR (iShares MSCI Norway ETF) and FLEE (Franklin FTSE Europe ETF) are both Europe Equities funds - ENOR tracks the MSCI Norway IMI 25/50 Index while FLEE tracks the FTSE Developed Europe RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ENOR returned 8.25%/yr vs 8.65%/yr for FLEE. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ENOR charges 0.53%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLEE.
Performance
ENOR vs. FLEE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ENOR achieves a 28.21% return, which is significantly higher than FLEE's 5.58% return.
ENOR
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- -1.34%
- YTD
- 28.21%
- 6M
- 33.17%
- 1Y
- 37.30%
- 3Y*
- 23.56%
- 5Y*
- 8.25%
- 10Y*
- 9.41%
FLEE
- 1D
- -1.22%
- 1M
- 2.47%
- YTD
- 5.58%
- 6M
- 8.37%
- 1Y
- 17.27%
- 3Y*
- 16.30%
- 5Y*
- 8.65%
- 10Y*
- —
ENOR vs. FLEE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENOR iShares MSCI Norway ETF | 28.21% | 32.00% | -2.29% | 4.80% | -12.53% | 18.69% | 2.54% | 12.77% | -8.50% | -2.25% |
FLEE Franklin FTSE Europe ETF | 5.58% | 35.76% | 2.03% | 20.46% | -15.22% | 16.84% | 5.33% | 24.41% | -14.97% | 1.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between ENOR and FLEE is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2017 | 0.69 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ENOR and FLEE has dropped to 0.43 - well below their long-term average of 0.69, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
ENOR vs. FLEE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ENOR
FLEE
Energy
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Technology
Utilities
Real Estate
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Energy
ENOR
FLEE
Financial Services
ENOR
FLEE
Industrials
ENOR
FLEE
Consumer Defensive
ENOR
FLEE
Basic Materials
ENOR
FLEE
Communication Services
ENOR
FLEE
Technology
ENOR
FLEE
Utilities
ENOR
FLEE
Real Estate
ENOR
FLEE
Consumer Cyclical
ENOR
FLEE
Healthcare
ENOR
-
FLEE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ENOR vs. FLEE — Risk / Return Rank
ENOR
FLEE
ENOR vs. FLEE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Norway ETF (ENOR) and Franklin FTSE Europe ETF (FLEE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ENOR | FLEE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.40 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.20 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.16 | 1.40 | +2.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.78 | 5.13 | +6.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ENOR | FLEE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.15 | 1.11 | +1.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 0.50 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.44 | -0.18 |
Drawdowns
ENOR vs. FLEE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENOR drawdown since its inception was -55.35%, which is greater than FLEE's maximum drawdown of -37.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENOR and FLEE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENOR | FLEE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.35% | -37.27% | -18.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.01% | -12.37% | +3.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.84% | -14.59% | -1.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.65% | -31.62% | -1.03% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.21% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.15% | -3.03% | -0.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.58% | -7.11% | -9.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.18% | 3.38% | -0.20% |
Volatility
ENOR vs. FLEE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Norway ETF (ENOR) is 5.14%, while Franklin FTSE Europe ETF (FLEE) has a volatility of 5.78%. This indicates that ENOR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLEE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ENOR | FLEE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.14% | 5.78% | -0.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.62% | 12.98% | +0.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.43% | 15.59% | +1.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.18% | 17.37% | +4.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.02% | 18.95% | +5.07% |
ENOR vs. FLEE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ENOR has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than FLEE's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
ENOR vs. FLEE - Dividend Comparison
ENOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, less than FLEE's 2.61% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENOR iShares MSCI Norway ETF | 2.31% | 2.96% | 6.32% | 5.06% | 4.02% | 2.24% | 2.39% | 3.15% | 2.79% | 2.47% | 2.96% | 3.24% |
FLEE Franklin FTSE Europe ETF | 2.61% | 2.76% | 3.93% | 2.57% | 3.48% | 3.61% | 1.88% | 3.02% | 3.85% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ENOR and FLEE have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLEE has higher volatility (5.78%) compared to ENOR (5.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ENOR dropped -55.35% vs FLEE's -37.27%.
On 5-year performance, FLEE leads with 8.65% vs 8.25% for ENOR. On fees, FLEE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, ENOR has been the lower-risk option at 5.14%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FLEE has performed better with a 8.65% return vs 8.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLEE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for ENOR.
FLEE has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 2.31% for ENOR.
ENOR tracks MSCI Norway IMI 25/50 Index, while FLEE tracks FTSE Developed Europe RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for ENOR and 0.09% for FLEE.
ENOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ENOR and FLEE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer