EDEN vs. ARGT
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Denmark ETF (EDEN) and Global X MSCI Argentina ETF (ARGT).
EDEN and ARGT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EDEN is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Denmark IMI 25/50 Index. It was launched on Jan 25, 2012. ARGT is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the MSCI All Argentina 25/50. It was launched on Mar 2, 2011. Both EDEN and ARGT are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: EDEN or ARGT.
Correlation
The correlation between EDEN and ARGT is 0.45, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
EDEN vs. ARGT - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
EDEN:
-0.39
ARGT:
2.84
EDEN:
-0.43
ARGT:
3.49
EDEN:
0.95
ARGT:
1.43
EDEN:
-0.29
ARGT:
5.02
EDEN:
-0.81
ARGT:
12.99
EDEN:
7.73%
ARGT:
6.04%
EDEN:
16.10%
ARGT:
27.58%
EDEN:
-36.61%
ARGT:
-61.68%
EDEN:
-20.76%
ARGT:
-2.83%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EDEN achieves a -1.73% return, which is significantly lower than ARGT's 4.95% return. Over the past 10 years, EDEN has underperformed ARGT with an annualized return of 10.16%, while ARGT has yielded a comparatively higher 18.28% annualized return.
EDEN
-1.73%
-6.98%
-15.13%
-5.73%
9.76%
10.16%
ARGT
4.95%
-0.03%
56.85%
78.62%
28.43%
18.28%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
EDEN vs. ARGT - Expense Ratio Comparison
EDEN has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is lower than ARGT's 0.60% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
EDEN vs. ARGT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
EDEN
ARGT
EDEN vs. ARGT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Denmark ETF (EDEN) and Global X MSCI Argentina ETF (ARGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
EDEN vs. ARGT - Dividend Comparison
EDEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, more than ARGT's 1.34% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDEN iShares MSCI Denmark ETF | 1.52% | 1.50% | 1.92% | 1.47% | 0.74% | 0.42% | 2.36% | 2.01% | 2.03% | 1.28% | 1.46% | 0.87% |
ARGT Global X MSCI Argentina ETF | 1.34% | 1.41% | 1.59% | 2.45% | 0.93% | 0.28% | 1.21% | 1.34% | 0.49% | 0.36% | 0.89% | 0.47% |
Drawdowns
EDEN vs. ARGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EDEN drawdown since its inception was -36.61%, smaller than the maximum ARGT drawdown of -61.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EDEN and ARGT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
EDEN vs. ARGT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Denmark ETF (EDEN) is 4.98%, while Global X MSCI Argentina ETF (ARGT) has a volatility of 11.17%. This indicates that EDEN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.