PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ENOR vs. BSMW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ENOR vs. BSMW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Norway ETF (ENOR) and Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ENOR achieves a 28.21% return, which is significantly higher than BSMW's 1.30% return.


ENOR

1D
-0.57%
1M
-1.34%
YTD
28.21%
6M
33.17%
1Y
37.30%
3Y*
23.56%
5Y*
8.25%
10Y*
9.41%

BSMW

1D
0.11%
1M
0.55%
YTD
1.30%
6M
1.59%
1Y
6.93%
3Y*
3.20%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ENOR vs. BSMW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
ENOR
iShares MSCI Norway ETF
28.21%32.00%-2.29%5.33%
BSMW
Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF
1.30%3.42%-0.35%7.00%

Correlation

The correlation between ENOR and BSMW is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2023

0.02

The correlation between ENOR and BSMW shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.05 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ENOR vs. BSMW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ENOR
BSMW

Energy

29.2%

-

Financial Services

22.4%
1.7%

Industrials

13.9%

-

Consumer Defensive

12.4%

-

Basic Materials

10.8%

-

Communication Services

5.8%

-

Technology

4.1%
0.1%

Utilities

0.7%

-

Real Estate

0.4%

-

Consumer Cyclical

0.2%
0.3%

Healthcare

-

-

Energy

ENOR
29.2%
BSMW

-

Financial Services

ENOR
22.4%
BSMW
1.7%

Industrials

ENOR
13.9%
BSMW

-

Consumer Defensive

ENOR
12.4%
BSMW

-

Basic Materials

ENOR
10.8%
BSMW

-

Communication Services

ENOR
5.8%
BSMW

-

Technology

ENOR
4.1%
BSMW
0.1%

Utilities

ENOR
0.7%
BSMW

-

Real Estate

ENOR
0.4%
BSMW

-

Consumer Cyclical

ENOR
0.2%
BSMW
0.3%

Healthcare

ENOR

-

BSMW

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ENOR vs. BSMW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ENOR
ENOR Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
ENOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENOR Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
ENOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENOR Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

BSMW
BSMW Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
BSMW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BSMW Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
BSMW Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
BSMW Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
BSMW Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ENOR vs. BSMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Norway ETF (ENOR) and Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ENORBSMWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.50

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.16

2.39

+1.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.78

7.53

+4.25

ENOR vs. BSMW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ENOR Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is comparable to the BSMW Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ENOR and BSMW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ENORBSMWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

2.48

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

0.69

-0.44

Drawdowns

ENOR vs. BSMW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENOR drawdown since its inception was -55.35%, which is greater than BSMW's maximum drawdown of -7.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENOR and BSMW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ENORBSMWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.35%

-7.57%

-47.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.01%

-2.92%

-6.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.84%

-7.34%

-8.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.15%

-0.98%

-2.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.58%

-1.72%

-14.86%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.18%

0.92%

+2.26%

Volatility

ENOR vs. BSMW - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Norway ETF (ENOR) has a higher volatility of 5.14% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMW) at 0.93%. This indicates that ENOR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSMW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ENORBSMWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.14%

0.93%

+4.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.62%

1.98%

+11.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.43%

2.82%

+14.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.18%

5.00%

+17.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.02%

5.00%

+19.02%

ENOR vs. BSMW - Expense Ratio Comparison

ENOR has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than BSMW's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

ENOR vs. BSMW - Dividend Comparison

ENOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, less than BSMW's 3.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BSMW
Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF
3.20%3.24%3.48%2.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ENOR
iShares MSCI Norway ETF
2.31%2.96%6.32%5.06%4.02%2.24%2.39%3.15%2.79%2.47%2.96%3.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


ENOR and BSMW have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ENOR has higher volatility (5.14%) compared to BSMW (0.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ENOR dropped -55.35% vs BSMW's -7.57%.

On 3-year performance, ENOR leads with 23.56% vs 3.20% for BSMW. On fees, BSMW is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, BSMW has been the lower-risk option at 0.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, ENOR has performed better with a 23.56% return vs 3.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BSMW is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for ENOR.

BSMW has the higher dividend yield at 3.20%, compared with 2.31% for ENOR.

ENOR is categorized as Europe Equities, while BSMW is Municipal Bonds. ENOR tracks MSCI Norway IMI 25/50 Index, while BSMW tracks Invesco BulletShares USD Municipal Bond 2032 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for ENOR and 0.18% for BSMW.

BSMW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ENOR and BSMW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer