ENOR vs. BSMW
ENOR (iShares MSCI Norway ETF) and BSMW (Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ENOR is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Norway IMI 25/50 Index, while BSMW is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the Invesco BulletShares USD Municipal Bond 2032 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, ENOR returned 23.56%/yr vs 3.20%/yr for BSMW. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ENOR charges 0.53%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for BSMW.
Performance
ENOR vs. BSMW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ENOR achieves a 28.21% return, which is significantly higher than BSMW's 1.30% return.
ENOR
- 1D
- -0.57%
- 1M
- -1.34%
- YTD
- 28.21%
- 6M
- 33.17%
- 1Y
- 37.30%
- 3Y*
- 23.56%
- 5Y*
- 8.25%
- 10Y*
- 9.41%
BSMW
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.55%
- YTD
- 1.30%
- 6M
- 1.59%
- 1Y
- 6.93%
- 3Y*
- 3.20%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ENOR vs. BSMW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
ENOR iShares MSCI Norway ETF | 28.21% | 32.00% | -2.29% | 5.33% |
BSMW Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF | 1.30% | 3.42% | -0.35% | 7.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between ENOR and BSMW is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2023 | 0.02 |
The correlation between ENOR and BSMW shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.05 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
ENOR vs. BSMW - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ENOR
BSMW
Energy
-
Financial Services
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Technology
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
-
Energy
ENOR
BSMW
-
Financial Services
ENOR
BSMW
Industrials
ENOR
BSMW
-
Consumer Defensive
ENOR
BSMW
-
Basic Materials
ENOR
BSMW
-
Communication Services
ENOR
BSMW
-
Technology
ENOR
BSMW
Utilities
ENOR
BSMW
-
Real Estate
ENOR
BSMW
-
Consumer Cyclical
ENOR
BSMW
Healthcare
ENOR
-
BSMW
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ENOR vs. BSMW — Risk / Return Rank
ENOR
BSMW
ENOR vs. BSMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Norway ETF (ENOR) and Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ENOR | BSMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.50 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.16 | 2.39 | +1.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.78 | 7.53 | +4.25 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ENOR | BSMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.15 | 2.48 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | 0.69 | -0.44 |
Drawdowns
ENOR vs. BSMW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENOR drawdown since its inception was -55.35%, which is greater than BSMW's maximum drawdown of -7.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENOR and BSMW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENOR | BSMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.35% | -7.57% | -47.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.01% | -2.92% | -6.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.84% | -7.34% | -8.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.65% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -54.21% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.15% | -0.98% | -2.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.58% | -1.72% | -14.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.18% | 0.92% | +2.26% |
Volatility
ENOR vs. BSMW - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI Norway ETF (ENOR) has a higher volatility of 5.14% compared to Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF (BSMW) at 0.93%. This indicates that ENOR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BSMW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ENOR | BSMW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.14% | 0.93% | +4.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.62% | 1.98% | +11.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.43% | 2.82% | +14.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.18% | 5.00% | +17.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.02% | 5.00% | +19.02% |
ENOR vs. BSMW - Expense Ratio Comparison
ENOR has a 0.53% expense ratio, which is higher than BSMW's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
ENOR vs. BSMW - Dividend Comparison
ENOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, less than BSMW's 3.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BSMW Invesco BulletShares 2032 Municipal Bond ETF | 3.20% | 3.24% | 3.48% | 2.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ENOR iShares MSCI Norway ETF | 2.31% | 2.96% | 6.32% | 5.06% | 4.02% | 2.24% | 2.39% | 3.15% | 2.79% | 2.47% | 2.96% | 3.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ENOR and BSMW have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ENOR has higher volatility (5.14%) compared to BSMW (0.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ENOR dropped -55.35% vs BSMW's -7.57%.
On 3-year performance, ENOR leads with 23.56% vs 3.20% for BSMW. On fees, BSMW is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, BSMW has been the lower-risk option at 0.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, ENOR has performed better with a 23.56% return vs 3.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BSMW is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.53% for ENOR.
BSMW has the higher dividend yield at 3.20%, compared with 2.31% for ENOR.
ENOR is categorized as Europe Equities, while BSMW is Municipal Bonds. ENOR tracks MSCI Norway IMI 25/50 Index, while BSMW tracks Invesco BulletShares USD Municipal Bond 2032 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.53% for ENOR and 0.18% for BSMW.
BSMW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ENOR and BSMW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer