PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ENOG.L vs. ML.PA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ENOG.L vs. ML.PA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Energean Oil & Gas plc (ENOG.L) and Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions (ML.PA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ENOG.L is traded in GBp, while ML.PA is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the ML.PA values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ENOG.L achieves a -13.13% return, which is significantly lower than ML.PA's 21.14% return.


ENOG.L

1D
-1.13%
1M
-13.13%
YTD
-13.13%
6M
-13.18%
1Y
-5.94%
3Y*
-4.02%
5Y*
6.07%
10Y*

ML.PA

1D
2.77%
1M
8.17%
YTD
21.14%
6M
21.39%
1Y
9.09%
3Y*
10.56%
5Y*
7.24%
10Y*
14.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ENOG.L vs. ML.PA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
ENOG.L
Energean Oil & Gas plc
-13.13%-6.16%8.39%-11.22%60.17%18.55%-22.45%48.02%38.39%
ML.PA
Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions
21.14%-2.39%-3.02%28.00%-10.88%39.49%11.27%37.60%-21.34%

Correlation

The correlation between ENOG.L and ML.PA is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2018

0.12

The correlation between ENOG.L and ML.PA shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ENOG.L vs. ML.PA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ENOG.L
ENOG.L Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
ENOG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENOG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENOG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
ENOG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENOG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

ML.PA
ML.PA Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
ML.PA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ML.PA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
ML.PA Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
ML.PA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
ML.PA Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ENOG.L vs. ML.PA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Energean Oil & Gas plc (ENOG.L) and Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions (ML.PA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ENOG.LML.PADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.08

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.23

0.38

-0.61

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.57

0.81

-1.38

ENOG.L vs. ML.PA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ENOG.L Sharpe Ratio is -0.21, which is lower than the ML.PA Sharpe Ratio of 0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ENOG.L and ML.PA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ENOG.L vs. ML.PA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENOG.L drawdown since its inception was -72.41%, which is greater than ML.PA's maximum drawdown of -64.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENOG.L and ML.PA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ENOG.LML.PADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-72.41%

-64.36%

-8.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.52%

-19.78%

-5.74%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.16%

-26.88%

-7.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.00%

-32.89%

-10.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.98%

-3.95%

-29.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.65%

-12.46%

-8.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.39%

9.34%

+1.05%

Volatility

ENOG.L vs. ML.PA - Volatility Comparison

Energean Oil & Gas plc (ENOG.L) has a higher volatility of 8.29% compared to Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions (ML.PA) at 5.35%. This indicates that ENOG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ML.PA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ENOG.LML.PADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.29%

5.35%

+2.94%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.72%

17.00%

+4.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.33%

22.82%

+5.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.90%

24.63%

+12.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

45.22%

26.48%

+18.74%

Dividends

ENOG.L vs. ML.PA - Dividend Comparison

ENOG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.99%, more than ML.PA's 4.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ENOG.L
Energean Oil & Gas plc
9.99%10.16%7.89%11.49%4.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ML.PA
Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions
4.16%4.87%4.25%3.85%17.31%6.38%7.62%13.56%16.38%10.87%10.78%11.37%

Financials

ENOG.L vs. ML.PA - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Energean Oil & Gas plc and Compagnie Générale des Établissements Michelin Société en commandite par actions. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. ENOG.L values in USD, ML.PA values in EUR

Frequently Asked Questions


ENOG.L and ML.PA have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ENOG.L and ML.PA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer