ENHU vs. WNTR
ENHU (iShares Enhanced Large Cap Core Active ETF) and WNTR (YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ENHU is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by iShares, while WNTR is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.45, they often move in opposite directions. ENHU charges 0.22%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for WNTR.
Performance
ENHU vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ENHU achieves a 10.91% return, which is significantly higher than WNTR's 10.13% return.
ENHU
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 1.43%
- 6M
- 8.67%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WNTR
- 1D
- 1.92%
- 1M
- 18.08%
- 6M
- 14.43%
- YTD
- 10.13%
- 1Y
- 120.64%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ENHU vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ENHU iShares Enhanced Large Cap Core Active ETF | 10.91% | 1.32% |
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF | 10.13% | 40.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between ENHU and WNTR is -0.45, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025 | -0.45 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ENHU vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank
ENHU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
WNTR
ENHU vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Enhanced Large Cap Core Active ETF (ENHU) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ENHU | WNTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.34 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.84 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 7.31 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ENHU vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENHU drawdown since its inception was -8.98%, smaller than the maximum WNTR drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENHU and WNTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENHU | WNTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.98% | -42.65% | +33.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -42.65% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.72% | -10.15% | +9.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.49% | -20.53% | +19.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 16.58% | — |
Volatility
ENHU vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ENHU | WNTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 18.84% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 47.46% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.62% | 53.83% | -40.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.62% | 53.56% | -39.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.62% | 53.56% | -39.94% |
ENHU vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
ENHU has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
ENHU vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison
ENHU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than WNTR's 102.14% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ENHU iShares Enhanced Large Cap Core Active ETF | 0.50% | 0.17% |
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF | 102.14% | 58.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ENHU and WNTR have a correlation of -0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ENHU is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ENHU is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for WNTR.
WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 102.14%, compared with 0.50% for ENHU.
ENHU is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: iShares and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for ENHU and 1.01% for WNTR.
Find the right allocation for ENHU and WNTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer