ENHU vs. SCHK
ENHU (iShares Enhanced Large Cap Core Active ETF) and SCHK (Schwab 1000 Index ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. ENHU is actively managed, while SCHK is passively managed. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. ENHU charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHK.
Performance
ENHU vs. SCHK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ENHU having a 10.91% return and SCHK slightly higher at 11.15%.
ENHU
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 1.43%
- 6M
- 8.67%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SCHK
- 1D
- 0.39%
- 1M
- 1.61%
- 6M
- 8.99%
- YTD
- 11.15%
- 1Y
- 21.51%
- 3Y*
- 20.11%
- 5Y*
- 12.46%
- 10Y*
- —
ENHU vs. SCHK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ENHU iShares Enhanced Large Cap Core Active ETF | 10.91% | 1.32% |
SCHK Schwab 1000 Index ETF | 11.15% | 1.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between ENHU and SCHK is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025 | 0.99 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ENHU vs. SCHK — Risk / Return Rank
ENHU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SCHK
ENHU vs. SCHK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Enhanced Large Cap Core Active ETF (ENHU) and Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ENHU | SCHK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.30 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.41 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.52 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ENHU vs. SCHK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENHU drawdown since its inception was -8.98%, smaller than the maximum SCHK drawdown of -34.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENHU and SCHK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENHU | SCHK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.98% | -34.80% | +25.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.21% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.44% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.72% | -0.64% | -0.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.49% | -5.14% | +3.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.05% | — |
Volatility
ENHU vs. SCHK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ENHU | SCHK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.72% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.16% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.62% | 12.84% | +0.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.62% | 17.35% | -3.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.62% | 19.07% | -5.45% |
ENHU vs. SCHK - Expense Ratio Comparison
ENHU has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHK's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ENHU vs. SCHK - Dividend Comparison
ENHU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than SCHK's 1.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENHU iShares Enhanced Large Cap Core Active ETF | 0.50% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SCHK Schwab 1000 Index ETF | 1.03% | 1.09% | 1.20% | 1.38% | 1.57% | 1.17% | 1.58% | 1.82% | 1.80% | 0.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, ENHU and SCHK move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, SCHK is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SCHK is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for ENHU.
SCHK has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.50% for ENHU.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for ENHU and 0.03% for SCHK.
Find the right allocation for ENHU and SCHK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer