ENHU vs. IWM

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

ENHU (iShares Enhanced Large Cap Core Active ETF) and IWM (iShares Russell 2000 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ENHU is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by iShares, while IWM is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index. ENHU is actively managed, while IWM is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ENHU charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for IWM.

Performance

ENHU vs. IWM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Enhanced Large Cap Core Active ETF (ENHU) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ENHU achieves a 10.96% return, which is significantly lower than IWM's 17.07% return.

ENHU

• 1D: -0.62%
• 1M: 4.83%
• YTD: 10.96%
• 6M: 11.23%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IWM

• 1D: -1.37%
• 1M: 3.52%
• YTD: 17.07%
• 6M: 15.83%
• 1Y: 39.10%
• 3Y*: 17.88%
• 5Y*: 6.11%
• 10Y*: 10.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ENHU vs. IWM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
ENHU iShares Enhanced Large Cap Core Active ETF	10.96%	1.32%
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF	17.07%	0.94%

Correlation

The correlation between ENHU and IWM is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2025	0.82

Return for Risk

ENHU vs. IWM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IWM

IWM Risk / Return Rank: 62
IWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
IWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
IWM Omega Ratio Rank: 53
IWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
IWM Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ENHU vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Enhanced Large Cap Core Active ETF (ENHU) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ENHU	IWM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.05	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.27	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.48	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.74	0.37	+1.38

Drawdowns

ENHU vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENHU drawdown since its inception was -8.98%, smaller than the maximum IWM drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENHU and IWM.

Drawdown Indicators

	ENHU	IWM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.98%	-59.05%	+50.07%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-11.03%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-27.50%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-31.91%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-41.13%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.62%	-1.49%	+0.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.49%	-10.77%	+9.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.10%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ENHU	IWM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.75%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	13.53%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.21%	19.20%	-5.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.21%	22.52%	-9.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	13.21%	23.04%	-9.83%

ENHU vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison

ENHU has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is higher than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ENHU vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison

ENHU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.34%, less than IWM's 0.88% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ENHU iShares Enhanced Large Cap Core Active ETF	0.34%	0.17%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF	0.88%	1.04%	1.15%	1.35%	1.48%	0.94%	1.04%	1.26%	1.40%	1.26%	1.38%	1.54%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ENHU and IWM in my portfolio?

ENHU and IWM have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, ENHU or IWM?

On fees, IWM is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, ENHU or IWM?

IWM is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for ENHU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ENHU or IWM?

IWM has the higher dividend yield at 0.88%, compared with 0.34% for ENHU.

What is the main difference between ENHU and IWM?

ENHU is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while IWM is Small Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for ENHU and 0.19% for IWM.