ENHU vs. IBIT
ENHU (iShares Enhanced Large Cap Core Active ETF) and IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ENHU is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by iShares, while IBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. ENHU is actively managed, while IBIT is passively managed. At a 0.49 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ENHU charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IBIT.
Performance
ENHU vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ENHU achieves a 10.91% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -29.06% return.
ENHU
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 1.43%
- 6M
- 8.67%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBIT
- 1D
- -2.79%
- 1M
- -2.28%
- 6M
- -32.10%
- YTD
- -29.06%
- 1Y
- -47.60%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ENHU vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ENHU iShares Enhanced Large Cap Core Active ETF | 10.91% | 1.32% |
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | -29.06% | -13.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between ENHU and IBIT is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025 | 0.49 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ENHU vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank
ENHU
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IBIT
ENHU vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Enhanced Large Cap Core Active ETF (ENHU) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ENHU | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.82 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.90 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -1.46 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ENHU vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENHU drawdown since its inception was -8.98%, smaller than the maximum IBIT drawdown of -53.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENHU and IBIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENHU | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -8.98% | -53.30% | +44.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -53.30% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.72% | -50.60% | +49.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.49% | -17.56% | +16.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 32.72% | — |
Volatility
ENHU vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ENHU | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.51% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 34.79% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.62% | 44.38% | -30.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.62% | 49.97% | -36.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.62% | 49.97% | -36.35% |
ENHU vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
ENHU has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
ENHU vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison
ENHU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ENHU iShares Enhanced Large Cap Core Active ETF | 0.50% | 0.17% |
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ENHU and IBIT have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ENHU is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ENHU is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IBIT.
ENHU has the higher dividend yield at 0.50%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.
ENHU is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for ENHU and 0.25% for IBIT.
Find the right allocation for ENHU and IBIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer