ENFR vs. VCRM
ENFR (Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF) and VCRM (Vanguard Core Tax-Exempt Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ENFR is a Infrastructure Equities fund tracking the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index, while VCRM is a Municipal Bonds fund tracking the S&P Broad AMT-Free Municipal Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ENFR returned 28.20% vs 5.81% for VCRM. Their -0.09 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. ENFR charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for VCRM.
Performance
ENFR vs. VCRM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ENFR achieves a 27.46% return, which is significantly higher than VCRM's 1.15% return.
ENFR
- 1D
- -0.63%
- 1M
- 3.26%
- 6M
- 20.04%
- YTD
- 27.46%
- 1Y
- 28.20%
- 3Y*
- 26.81%
- 5Y*
- 22.10%
- 10Y*
- 11.73%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.53%
VCRM
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -1.59%
- 6M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 1.15%
- 1Y
- 5.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.29%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $5.48M | $4.07M | $3.20M | |
| $18.95M | $17.75M | $16.81M |
ENFR vs. VCRM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 27.46% | 5.88% | -3.14% |
VCRM Vanguard Core Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 1.15% | 4.91% | -0.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between ENFR and VCRM is -0.25, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2024 | -0.09 |
The correlation between ENFR and VCRM shifts across timeframes, from -0.25 (1 year) to -0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ENFR vs. VCRM — Risk / Return Rank
ENFR
VCRM
ENFR vs. VCRM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) and Vanguard Core Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VCRM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ENFR | VCRM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.41 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.28 | 2.14 | +1.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.01 | 7.45 | +0.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ENFR vs. VCRM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENFR drawdown since its inception was -68.28%, which is greater than VCRM's maximum drawdown of -4.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENFR and VCRM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENFR | VCRM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.28% | -4.12% | -64.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.64% | -2.72% | -5.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.29% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.18% | -1.59% | -1.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.82% | -1.07% | -14.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.53% | 0.78% | +2.75% |
Volatility
ENFR vs. VCRM - Volatility Comparison
Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) has a higher volatility of 5.48% compared to Vanguard Core Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VCRM) at 1.03%. This indicates that ENFR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VCRM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ENFR | VCRM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.48% | 1.03% | +4.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.31% | 2.39% | +9.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.26% | 2.98% | +12.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.20% | 3.80% | +15.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.65% | 3.80% | +20.85% |
ENFR vs. VCRM - Expense Ratio Comparison
ENFR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than VCRM's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
ENFR vs. VCRM - Dividend Comparison
ENFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.94%, more than VCRM's 3.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 3.94% | 4.77% | 4.41% | 5.48% | 5.23% | 7.86% | 7.57% | 5.81% | 3.98% | 2.98% | 3.31% | 3.34% |
VCRM Vanguard Core Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 3.74% | 3.42% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ENFR and VCRM have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ENFR has higher volatility (5.48%) compared to VCRM (1.03%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ENFR dropped -68.28% vs VCRM's -4.12%.
On 1-year performance, ENFR leads with 28.20% vs 5.81% for VCRM. On fees, VCRM is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, VCRM has been the lower-risk option at 1.03%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ENFR has performed better with a 28.20% return vs 5.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VCRM is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for ENFR.
ENFR has the higher dividend yield at 3.94%, compared with 3.74% for VCRM.
ENFR is categorized as Infrastructure Equities, while VCRM is Municipal Bonds. ENFR tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index, while VCRM tracks S&P Broad AMT-Free Municipal Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for ENFR and 0.12% for VCRM.
VCRM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ENFR and VCRM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer