VCRM vs. VSDM
VCRM (Vanguard Core Tax-Exempt Bond ETF) and VSDM (Vanguard Short Duration Tax-Exempt Bond ETF) are both Municipal Bonds funds from Vanguard. VCRM is passively managed, while VSDM is actively managed. Over the past year, VCRM returned 8.18% vs 4.98% for VSDM. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.12% expense ratio.
Performance
VCRM vs. VSDM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, VCRM achieves a 1.95% return, which is significantly higher than VSDM's 1.22% return.
VCRM
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.74%
- YTD
- 1.95%
- 6M
- 2.36%
- 1Y
- 8.18%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VSDM
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 1.22%
- 6M
- 1.63%
- 1Y
- 4.98%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VCRM vs. VSDM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
VCRM Vanguard Core Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 1.95% | 4.91% | -0.58% |
VSDM Vanguard Short Duration Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 1.22% | 5.39% | -0.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between VCRM and VSDM is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2024 | 0.70 |
The correlation between VCRM and VSDM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
VCRM vs. VSDM — Risk / Return Rank
VCRM
VSDM
VCRM vs. VSDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Core Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VCRM) and Vanguard Short Duration Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VSDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| VCRM | VSDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.36 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 1.92 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.02 | 3.42 | -0.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.19 | 12.07 | -0.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| VCRM | VSDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.70 | 3.67 | -0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.07 | 2.19 | -1.12 |
Drawdowns
VCRM vs. VSDM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum VCRM drawdown since its inception was -4.12%, which is greater than VSDM's maximum drawdown of -1.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VCRM and VSDM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| VCRM | VSDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.12% | -1.81% | -2.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.72% | -1.46% | -1.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.26% | -0.33% | +0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.13% | -0.32% | -0.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.73% | 0.41% | +0.32% |
Volatility
VCRM vs. VSDM - Volatility Comparison
Vanguard Core Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VCRM) has a higher volatility of 0.98% compared to Vanguard Short Duration Tax-Exempt Bond ETF (VSDM) at 0.44%. This indicates that VCRM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VSDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| VCRM | VSDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.98% | 0.44% | +0.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.17% | 1.07% | +1.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.05% | 1.36% | +1.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.89% | 1.95% | +1.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.89% | 1.95% | +1.94% |
VCRM vs. VSDM - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both VCRM and VSDM have an expense ratio of 0.12%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
VCRM vs. VSDM - Dividend Comparison
VCRM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.64%, more than VSDM's 3.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
VCRM Vanguard Core Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 3.64% | 3.42% | 0.40% |
VSDM Vanguard Short Duration Tax-Exempt Bond ETF | 3.11% | 3.06% | 0.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
VCRM and VSDM have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VCRM has higher volatility (0.98%) compared to VSDM (0.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VCRM dropped -4.12% vs VSDM's -1.81%.
On 1-year performance, VCRM leads with 8.18% vs 4.98% for VSDM. Both ETFs have the same 0.12% expense ratio. On volatility, VSDM has been the lower-risk option at 0.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, VCRM has performed better with a 8.18% return vs 4.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VCRM and VSDM have the same expense ratio: 0.12% per year.
VCRM has the higher dividend yield at 3.64%, compared with 3.11% for VSDM.
VSDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.67 vs 2.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for VCRM and VSDM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer