UMI vs. AMNA
Compare and contrast key facts about USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI) and ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN (AMNA).
UMI and AMNA are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. UMI is an actively managed fund by Wainwright, Inc.. It was launched on Mar 24, 2021. AMNA is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index. It was launched on Jun 19, 2020.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: UMI or AMNA.
Correlation
The correlation between UMI and AMNA is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
UMI vs. AMNA - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
Returns By Period
UMI
-0.71%
5.30%
6.29%
26.80%
26.79%
N/A
AMNA
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UMI vs. AMNA - Expense Ratio Comparison
UMI has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than AMNA's 0.75% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
UMI vs. AMNA — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
UMI
AMNA
UMI vs. AMNA - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI) and ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN (AMNA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
UMI vs. AMNA - Dividend Comparison
UMI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.07%, while AMNA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UMI USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF | 4.07% | 4.39% | 4.67% | 4.78% | 3.37% | 2.18% | 2.47% | 2.48% | 0.15% |
AMNA ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN | 2.19% | 4.32% | 5.61% | 5.48% | 5.84% | 2.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
UMI vs. AMNA - Drawdown Comparison
Volatility
UMI vs. AMNA - Volatility Comparison
USCF Midstream Energy Income Fund ETF (UMI) has a higher volatility of 12.54% compared to ETRACS Alerian Midstream Energy Index ETN (AMNA) at 0.00%. This indicates that UMI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMNA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Recent discussions
technical support
Marcus Crahan
Performance return calculation
Is the performance return calculation include dividend or interest paid and for the case of ETF's is the expense fee subtracted?
Thanks!
Marcus Crahan
Market filter for screeners
Scott Allen