ENFR vs. SCHD
ENFR (Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF) and SCHD (Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - ENFR is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index, while SCHD is a Dividend fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ENFR returned 12.28%/yr vs 12.91%/yr for SCHD. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ENFR charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for SCHD.
Performance
ENFR vs. SCHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ENFR achieves a 25.97% return, which is significantly higher than SCHD's 20.66% return. Over the past 10 years, ENFR has underperformed SCHD with an annualized return of 12.28%, while SCHD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.91% annualized return.
ENFR
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- 25.97%
- 6M
- 26.39%
- 1Y
- 26.50%
- 3Y*
- 28.39%
- 5Y*
- 19.43%
- 10Y*
- 12.28%
SCHD
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- 3.37%
- YTD
- 20.66%
- 6M
- 19.57%
- 1Y
- 26.16%
- 3Y*
- 14.90%
- 5Y*
- 8.75%
- 10Y*
- 12.91%
ENFR vs. SCHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 25.97% | 5.88% | 42.17% | 15.63% | 17.48% | 39.97% | -24.14% | 21.60% | -18.67% | -0.19% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 20.66% | 4.34% | 11.66% | 4.54% | -3.26% | 29.87% | 15.03% | 27.29% | -5.56% | 20.85% |
Correlation
The correlation between ENFR and SCHD is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2013 | 0.56 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ENFR and SCHD has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.56, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
ENFR vs. SCHD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ENFR
SCHD
Energy
Industrials
Utilities
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Energy
ENFR
SCHD
Industrials
ENFR
SCHD
Utilities
ENFR
SCHD
Financial Services
ENFR
SCHD
Basic Materials
ENFR
-
SCHD
Communication Services
ENFR
-
SCHD
Consumer Cyclical
ENFR
-
SCHD
Consumer Defensive
ENFR
-
SCHD
Healthcare
ENFR
-
SCHD
Real Estate
ENFR
-
SCHD
-
Technology
ENFR
-
SCHD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ENFR vs. SCHD — Risk / Return Rank
ENFR
SCHD
ENFR vs. SCHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) and Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ENFR | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.43 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.08 | 5.70 | -2.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.18 | 13.97 | -5.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ENFR vs. SCHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENFR drawdown since its inception was -68.28%, which is greater than SCHD's maximum drawdown of -33.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENFR and SCHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENFR | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.28% | -33.37% | -34.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.64% | -4.61% | -4.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.58% | -16.13% | +0.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.29% | -16.85% | -3.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.64% | -33.37% | -29.27% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.91% | -0.03% | -3.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.95% | -3.31% | -12.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.25% | 1.89% | +1.36% |
Volatility
ENFR vs. SCHD - Volatility Comparison
Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) has a higher volatility of 5.63% compared to Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF (SCHD) at 3.05%. This indicates that ENFR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ENFR | SCHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.63% | 3.05% | +2.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.48% | 7.53% | +3.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.66% | 10.93% | +3.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.30% | 14.38% | +4.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.67% | 16.72% | +7.95% |
ENFR vs. SCHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
ENFR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHD's 0.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
ENFR vs. SCHD - Dividend Comparison
ENFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.98%, more than SCHD's 3.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 3.98% | 4.77% | 4.41% | 5.48% | 5.23% | 7.86% | 7.57% | 5.81% | 3.98% | 2.98% | 3.31% | 3.34% |
SCHD Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF | 3.22% | 3.82% | 3.64% | 3.49% | 3.39% | 2.78% | 3.16% | 2.98% | 3.06% | 2.63% | 2.89% | 2.97% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ENFR and SCHD have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ENFR has higher volatility (5.63%) compared to SCHD (3.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ENFR dropped -68.28% vs SCHD's -33.37%.
On 10-year performance, SCHD leads with 12.91% vs 12.28% for ENFR. On fees, SCHD is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, SCHD has been the lower-risk option at 3.05%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SCHD has performed better with a 12.91% return vs 12.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHD is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for ENFR.
ENFR has the higher dividend yield at 3.98%, compared with 3.22% for SCHD.
ENFR is categorized as Energy Equities, while SCHD is Dividend. ENFR tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index, while SCHD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for ENFR and 0.06% for SCHD.
SCHD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ENFR and SCHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer