ENFR vs. GXPE
ENFR (Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF) and GXPE (Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF) are both Energy Equities funds - ENFR tracks the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index while GXPE tracks the MSCI USA Energy PureCap Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ENFR charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for GXPE.
Performance
ENFR vs. GXPE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ENFR achieves a 24.60% return, which is significantly lower than GXPE's 31.18% return.
ENFR
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -1.01%
- YTD
- 24.60%
- 6M
- 24.41%
- 1Y
- 25.40%
- 3Y*
- 27.99%
- 5Y*
- 19.91%
- 10Y*
- 11.96%
GXPE
- 1D
- 1.65%
- 1M
- -1.13%
- YTD
- 31.18%
- 6M
- 29.39%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ENFR vs. GXPE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 24.60% | 2.79% |
GXPE Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF | 31.18% | 4.62% |
Correlation
The correlation between ENFR and GXPE is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025 | 0.69 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ENFR vs. GXPE — Risk / Return Rank
ENFR
GXPE
ENFR vs. GXPE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) and Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF (GXPE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ENFR | GXPE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.95 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.06 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ENFR | GXPE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.75 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.34 | 2.18 | -1.84 |
Drawdowns
ENFR vs. GXPE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENFR drawdown since its inception was -68.28%, which is greater than GXPE's maximum drawdown of -12.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENFR and GXPE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENFR | GXPE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.28% | -12.37% | -55.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.64% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.29% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.95% | -6.88% | +1.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.98% | -3.21% | -12.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.16% | — | — |
Volatility
ENFR vs. GXPE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ENFR | GXPE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.18% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.47% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.64% | 20.42% | -5.78% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.30% | 20.42% | -1.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.69% | 20.42% | +4.27% |
ENFR vs. GXPE - Expense Ratio Comparison
ENFR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than GXPE's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
ENFR vs. GXPE - Dividend Comparison
ENFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.03%, more than GXPE's 0.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 4.03% | 4.77% | 4.41% | 5.48% | 5.23% | 7.86% | 7.57% | 5.81% | 3.98% | 2.98% | 3.31% | 3.34% |
GXPE Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF | 0.92% | 1.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ENFR and GXPE have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, GXPE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
GXPE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for ENFR.
ENFR has the higher dividend yield at 4.03%, compared with 0.92% for GXPE.
ENFR tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index, while GXPE tracks MSCI USA Energy PureCap Index. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for ENFR and 0.15% for GXPE.
Find the right allocation for ENFR and GXPE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer