PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ENFR vs. GXPE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ENFR vs. GXPE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) and Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF (GXPE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ENFR achieves a 24.60% return, which is significantly lower than GXPE's 31.18% return.


ENFR

1D
0.10%
1M
-1.01%
YTD
24.60%
6M
24.41%
1Y
25.40%
3Y*
27.99%
5Y*
19.91%
10Y*
11.96%

GXPE

1D
1.65%
1M
-1.13%
YTD
31.18%
6M
29.39%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ENFR vs. GXPE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
ENFR
Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF
24.60%2.79%
GXPE
Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF
31.18%4.62%

Correlation

The correlation between ENFR and GXPE is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025

0.69

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ENFR vs. GXPE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ENFR
ENFR Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
ENFR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENFR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENFR Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
ENFR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENFR Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

GXPE
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ENFR vs. GXPE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) and Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF (GXPE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ENFRGXPEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.06

ENFR vs. GXPE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ENFRGXPEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.75

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

2.18

-1.84

Drawdowns

ENFR vs. GXPE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENFR drawdown since its inception was -68.28%, which is greater than GXPE's maximum drawdown of -12.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENFR and GXPE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ENFRGXPEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.28%

-12.37%

-55.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.95%

-6.88%

+1.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.98%

-3.21%

-12.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.16%

Volatility

ENFR vs. GXPE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ENFRGXPEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.64%

20.42%

-5.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.30%

20.42%

-1.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.69%

20.42%

+4.27%

ENFR vs. GXPE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ENFR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than GXPE's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

ENFR vs. GXPE - Dividend Comparison

ENFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.03%, more than GXPE's 0.92% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ENFR
Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF
4.03%4.77%4.41%5.48%5.23%7.86%7.57%5.81%3.98%2.98%3.31%3.34%
GXPE
Global X PureCap MSCI Energy ETF
0.92%1.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ENFR and GXPE have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GXPE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GXPE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for ENFR.

ENFR has the higher dividend yield at 4.03%, compared with 0.92% for GXPE.

ENFR tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index, while GXPE tracks MSCI USA Energy PureCap Index. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for ENFR and 0.15% for GXPE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ENFR and GXPE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer