ENFR vs. GUNR
ENFR (Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF) and GUNR (FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - ENFR is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index, while GUNR is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ENFR returned 12.09%/yr vs 10.82%/yr for GUNR. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ENFR charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for GUNR.
Performance
ENFR vs. GUNR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ENFR achieves a 25.06% return, which is significantly higher than GUNR's 14.38% return. Over the past 10 years, ENFR has outperformed GUNR with an annualized return of 12.09%, while GUNR has yielded a comparatively lower 10.82% annualized return.
ENFR
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 0.28%
- YTD
- 25.06%
- 6M
- 25.48%
- 1Y
- 26.53%
- 3Y*
- 28.18%
- 5Y*
- 19.26%
- 10Y*
- 12.09%
GUNR
- 1D
- 1.38%
- 1M
- -6.21%
- YTD
- 14.38%
- 6M
- 15.02%
- 1Y
- 33.05%
- 3Y*
- 12.46%
- 5Y*
- 9.21%
- 10Y*
- 10.82%
ENFR vs. GUNR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 25.06% | 5.88% | 42.17% | 15.63% | 17.48% | 39.97% | -24.14% | 21.60% | -18.67% | -0.19% |
GUNR FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund | 14.38% | 30.03% | -8.37% | -2.40% | 14.83% | 26.06% | 0.46% | 18.41% | -9.42% | 18.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between ENFR and GUNR is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2013 | 0.67 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ENFR and GUNR has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.67, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
ENFR vs. GUNR - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ENFR
GUNR
Energy
Industrials
Utilities
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Energy
ENFR
GUNR
Industrials
ENFR
GUNR
Utilities
ENFR
GUNR
Financial Services
ENFR
GUNR
Basic Materials
ENFR
-
GUNR
Communication Services
ENFR
-
GUNR
Consumer Cyclical
ENFR
-
GUNR
Consumer Defensive
ENFR
-
GUNR
Healthcare
ENFR
-
GUNR
-
Real Estate
ENFR
-
GUNR
Technology
ENFR
-
GUNR
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ENFR vs. GUNR — Risk / Return Rank
ENFR
GUNR
ENFR vs. GUNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) and FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund (GUNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ENFR | GUNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.30 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.37 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.08 | 4.27 | -1.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.21 | 16.27 | -8.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ENFR vs. GUNR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENFR drawdown since its inception was -68.28%, which is greater than GUNR's maximum drawdown of -45.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENFR and GUNR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENFR | GUNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.28% | -45.64% | -22.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.64% | -7.77% | -0.87% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.58% | -19.59% | +4.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.29% | -24.06% | +3.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.64% | -43.04% | -19.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.61% | -6.50% | +1.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.96% | -10.39% | -5.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.24% | 2.04% | +1.20% |
Volatility
ENFR vs. GUNR - Volatility Comparison
Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) has a higher volatility of 5.61% compared to FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund (GUNR) at 4.92%. This indicates that ENFR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GUNR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ENFR | GUNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.61% | 4.92% | +0.69% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.52% | 13.12% | -1.60% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.67% | 15.66% | -0.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.31% | 19.06% | +0.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.66% | 20.43% | +4.23% |
ENFR vs. GUNR - Expense Ratio Comparison
ENFR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than GUNR's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
ENFR vs. GUNR - Dividend Comparison
ENFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.01%, more than GUNR's 2.34% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 4.01% | 4.77% | 4.41% | 5.48% | 5.23% | 7.86% | 7.57% | 5.81% | 3.98% | 2.98% | 3.31% | 3.34% |
GUNR FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund | 2.34% | 2.81% | 3.39% | 3.55% | 4.12% | 3.61% | 2.79% | 3.25% | 3.27% | 2.00% | 1.73% | 4.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ENFR and GUNR have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ENFR has higher volatility (5.61%) compared to GUNR (4.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ENFR dropped -68.28% vs GUNR's -45.64%.
On 10-year performance, ENFR leads with 12.09% vs 10.82% for GUNR. On fees, ENFR is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, GUNR has been the lower-risk option at 4.92%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, ENFR has performed better with a 12.09% return vs 10.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ENFR is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for GUNR.
ENFR has the higher dividend yield at 4.01%, compared with 2.34% for GUNR.
ENFR is categorized as Energy Equities, while GUNR is Commodity Producers Equities. ENFR tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index, while GUNR tracks Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for ENFR and 0.46% for GUNR.
GUNR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ENFR and GUNR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer