ENFR vs. FETH
ENFR (Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF) and FETH (Fidelity Ethereum Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - ENFR is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index, while FETH is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Fidelity Ethereum Reference Rate Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, ENFR returned 26.50% vs -38.43% for FETH. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ENFR charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FETH.
Performance
ENFR vs. FETH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ENFR achieves a 25.97% return, which is significantly higher than FETH's -44.01% return.
ENFR
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- 0.52%
- YTD
- 25.97%
- 6M
- 26.39%
- 1Y
- 26.50%
- 3Y*
- 28.39%
- 5Y*
- 19.43%
- 10Y*
- 12.28%
FETH
- 1D
- -1.01%
- 1M
- -26.28%
- YTD
- -44.01%
- 6M
- -46.08%
- 1Y
- -38.43%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ENFR vs. FETH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 25.97% | 5.88% | 15.06% |
FETH Fidelity Ethereum Fund | -44.01% | -11.37% | -4.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between ENFR and FETH is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2024 | 0.14 |
The correlation between ENFR and FETH shifts across timeframes, from 0.04 (1 year) to 0.14 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ENFR vs. FETH — Risk / Return Rank
ENFR
FETH
ENFR vs. FETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) and Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ENFR | FETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 0.94 | +0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.08 | -0.57 | +3.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.18 | -0.98 | +9.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ENFR vs. FETH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENFR drawdown since its inception was -68.28%, roughly equal to the maximum FETH drawdown of -67.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENFR and FETH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENFR | FETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.28% | -67.57% | -0.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.64% | -67.57% | +58.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.29% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.64% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.91% | -65.74% | +61.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.95% | -33.30% | +17.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.25% | 39.31% | -36.06% |
Volatility
ENFR vs. FETH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF (ENFR) is 5.63%, while Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH) has a volatility of 17.03%. This indicates that ENFR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FETH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ENFR | FETH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.63% | 17.03% | -11.40% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.48% | 46.32% | -34.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.66% | 69.12% | -54.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.30% | 72.38% | -53.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.67% | 72.38% | -47.71% |
ENFR vs. FETH - Expense Ratio Comparison
ENFR has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FETH's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
ENFR vs. FETH - Dividend Comparison
ENFR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.98%, while FETH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENFR Alerian Energy Infrastructure ETF | 3.98% | 4.77% | 4.41% | 5.48% | 5.23% | 7.86% | 7.57% | 5.81% | 3.98% | 2.98% | 3.31% | 3.34% |
FETH Fidelity Ethereum Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ENFR and FETH have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FETH has higher volatility (17.03%) compared to ENFR (5.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ENFR dropped -68.28% vs FETH's -67.57%.
On 1-year performance, ENFR leads with 26.50% vs -38.43% for FETH. On fees, FETH is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, ENFR has been the lower-risk option at 5.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, ENFR has performed better with a 26.50% return vs -38.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FETH is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for ENFR.
ENFR has the higher dividend yield at 3.98%, compared with 0.00% for FETH.
ENFR is categorized as Energy Equities, while FETH is Cryptocurrency. ENFR tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Select Index, while FETH tracks Fidelity Ethereum Reference Rate Index. They also come from different issuers: SS&C and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for ENFR and 0.25% for FETH.
ENFR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ENFR and FETH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer