PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ENEL.MI vs. NOMD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

ENEL.MI vs. NOMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in Enel SpA (ENEL.MI) and Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ENEL.MI is traded in EUR, while NOMD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the NOMD values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ENEL.MI achieves a 10.47% return, which is significantly higher than NOMD's -16.59% return. Over the past 10 years, ENEL.MI has outperformed NOMD with an annualized return of 14.44%, while NOMD has yielded a comparatively lower 1.17% annualized return.


ENEL.MI

1D
0.92%
1M
-0.60%
YTD
10.47%
6M
11.78%
1Y
26.19%
3Y*
24.29%
5Y*
10.49%
10Y*
14.44%

NOMD

1D
0.09%
1M
9.45%
YTD
-16.59%
6M
-13.64%
1Y
-39.12%
3Y*
-16.66%
5Y*
-17.77%
10Y*
1.17%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ENEL.MI vs. NOMD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ENEL.MI
Enel SpA
10.47%37.33%9.21%43.23%-23.69%-11.12%21.93%47.28%0.56%25.73%
NOMD
Nomad Foods Limited
-16.59%-31.39%9.14%-4.63%-27.89%7.35%4.27%36.81%3.52%54.98%

Correlation

The correlation between ENEL.MI and NOMD is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.16

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.14

The correlation between ENEL.MI and NOMD shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (1 year) to 0.16 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ENEL.MI vs. NOMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ENEL.MI
ENEL.MI Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
ENEL.MI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ENEL.MI Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
ENEL.MI Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
ENEL.MI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
ENEL.MI Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

NOMD
NOMD Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
NOMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NOMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
NOMD Omega Ratio Rank: 44
Omega Ratio Rank
NOMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
NOMD Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ENEL.MI vs. NOMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Enel SpA (ENEL.MI) and Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ENEL.MINOMDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

0.76

+0.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.30

-0.84

+3.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.96

-1.27

+8.23

ENEL.MI vs. NOMD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ENEL.MI Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is higher than the NOMD Sharpe Ratio of -1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ENEL.MI and NOMD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ENEL.MINOMDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33

-1.27

+2.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

-0.63

+1.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.04

+0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.30

-0.06

+0.36

Drawdowns

ENEL.MI vs. NOMD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ENEL.MI drawdown since its inception was -58.83%, smaller than the maximum NOMD drawdown of -66.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENEL.MI and NOMD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ENEL.MINOMDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.83%

-66.76%

+7.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.06%

-46.87%

+35.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.49%

-56.63%

+43.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.05%

-66.40%

+19.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.08%

-66.76%

+16.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.15%

-63.12%

+56.97%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.50%

-22.63%

+6.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.66%

30.81%

-27.15%

Volatility

ENEL.MI vs. NOMD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Enel SpA (ENEL.MI) is 5.95%, while Nomad Foods Limited (NOMD) has a volatility of 13.35%. This indicates that ENEL.MI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NOMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ENEL.MINOMDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.95%

13.35%

-7.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.22%

24.16%

-6.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.19%

30.87%

-11.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.07%

28.46%

-7.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.80%

28.47%

-5.67%

Dividends

ENEL.MI vs. NOMD - Dividend Comparison

ENEL.MI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.07%, less than NOMD's 6.85% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ENEL.MI
Enel SpA
5.07%5.29%6.24%5.94%7.55%5.08%3.96%3.96%2.36%2.14%1.91%2.31%
NOMD
Nomad Foods Limited
6.85%5.44%3.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

ENEL.MI vs. NOMD - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Enel SpA and Nomad Foods Limited. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Please note, different currencies. ENEL.MI values in EUR, NOMD values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


ENEL.MI and NOMD have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ENEL.MI and NOMD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer