ENB vs. EMLC
ENB (Enbridge Inc.) is a stock, while EMLC (VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF) is Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the J.P. Morgan Government Bond Index Emerging Markets Global Core Index. Over the past 10 years, ENB returned 9.68%/yr vs 2.28%/yr for EMLC. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
ENB vs. EMLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ENB achieves a 21.23% return, which is significantly higher than EMLC's 1.40% return. Over the past 10 years, ENB has outperformed EMLC with an annualized return of 9.68%, while EMLC has yielded a comparatively lower 2.28% annualized return.
ENB
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 2.15%
- YTD
- 21.23%
- 6M
- 21.95%
- 1Y
- 27.81%
- 3Y*
- 22.21%
- 5Y*
- 14.42%
- 10Y*
- 9.68%
EMLC
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 0.74%
- YTD
- 1.40%
- 6M
- 2.50%
- 1Y
- 9.22%
- 3Y*
- 6.63%
- 5Y*
- 1.36%
- 10Y*
- 2.28%
ENB vs. EMLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENB Enbridge Inc. | 21.23% | 19.51% | 26.35% | -1.13% | 6.46% | 30.83% | -13.60% | 36.05% | -15.53% | -2.73% |
EMLC VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF | 1.40% | 18.81% | -2.97% | 11.18% | -10.58% | -9.72% | 3.08% | 9.79% | -7.57% | 13.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between ENB and EMLC is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2010 | 0.37 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ENB and EMLC has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.37, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ENB vs. EMLC — Risk / Return Rank
ENB
EMLC
ENB vs. EMLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Enbridge Inc. (ENB) and VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (EMLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ENB | EMLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.24 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.03 | 1.42 | +1.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.64 | 4.75 | +2.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ENB vs. EMLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ENB drawdown since its inception was -46.35%, which is greater than EMLC's maximum drawdown of -32.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ENB and EMLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ENB | EMLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.35% | -32.43% | -13.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.10% | -6.19% | -2.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.29% | -9.15% | -6.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.32% | -24.58% | -3.74% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.07% | -26.47% | -17.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.65% | -3.83% | +1.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.83% | -14.35% | +3.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.64% | 1.86% | +1.78% |
Volatility
ENB vs. EMLC - Volatility Comparison
Enbridge Inc. (ENB) has a higher volatility of 5.99% compared to VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF (EMLC) at 2.44%. This indicates that ENB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ENB | EMLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.99% | 2.44% | +3.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.96% | 6.17% | +6.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.21% | 7.06% | +9.15% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.65% | 9.14% | +9.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.33% | 10.04% | +14.29% |
Dividends
ENB vs. EMLC - Dividend Comparison
ENB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.91%, less than EMLC's 6.16% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMLC VanEck Vectors J.P. Morgan EM Local Currency Bond ETF | 6.16% | 5.91% | 6.55% | 5.97% | 5.54% | 5.25% | 4.90% | 6.25% | 6.50% | 5.34% | 5.32% | 6.25% |
ENB Enbridge Inc. | 4.91% | 5.66% | 6.28% | 7.31% | 6.80% | 6.85% | 7.55% | 5.58% | 6.68% | 4.71% | 4.13% | 4.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ENB and EMLC have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ENB has higher volatility (5.99%) compared to EMLC (2.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ENB dropped -46.35% vs EMLC's -32.43%.
ENB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ENB and EMLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer