EMXF vs. UGA
EMXF (iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF) and UGA (United States Gasoline Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - EMXF is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Choice ESG Screened 5% Issuer Capped Index, while UGA is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMXF returned 7.11%/yr vs 22.69%/yr for UGA. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. EMXF charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for UGA.
Performance
EMXF vs. UGA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, EMXF achieves a 24.26% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 64.09% return.
EMXF
- 1D
- -4.12%
- 1M
- 5.10%
- YTD
- 24.26%
- 6M
- 24.79%
- 1Y
- 43.07%
- 3Y*
- 21.44%
- 5Y*
- 7.11%
- 10Y*
- —
UGA
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- -12.11%
- YTD
- 64.09%
- 6M
- 60.42%
- 1Y
- 59.74%
- 3Y*
- 18.95%
- 5Y*
- 22.69%
- 10Y*
- 14.31%
EMXF vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMXF iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF | 24.26% | 29.40% | 8.03% | 6.63% | -18.99% | 4.45% | 15.65% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 64.09% | -2.00% | 3.77% | 1.27% | 46.34% | 68.49% | 21.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between EMXF and UGA is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2020 | 0.08 |
The correlation between EMXF and UGA shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to 0.08 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
EMXF vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank
EMXF
UGA
EMXF vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF (EMXF) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| EMXF | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.57 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.30 | +0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.45 | 3.17 | +0.29 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.92 | 9.39 | +3.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
EMXF vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum EMXF drawdown since its inception was -33.13%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMXF and UGA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| EMXF | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.13% | -86.59% | +53.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.53% | -18.96% | +6.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.93% | -26.68% | +10.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.89% | -38.11% | +5.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.12% | -18.05% | +13.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.93% | -36.69% | +24.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.34% | 6.43% | -3.09% |
Volatility
EMXF vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF (EMXF) has a higher volatility of 10.32% compared to United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) at 9.24%. This indicates that EMXF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| EMXF | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.32% | 9.24% | +1.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.35% | 30.57% | -12.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.37% | 35.22% | -14.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.50% | 34.45% | -11.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.99% | 37.22% | -15.23% |
EMXF vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison
EMXF has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
EMXF vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison
EMXF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMXF iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF | 2.67% | 3.43% | 2.92% | 2.25% | 2.42% | 1.87% | 0.41% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
EMXF and UGA have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EMXF has higher volatility (10.32%) compared to UGA (9.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMXF dropped -33.13% vs UGA's -86.59%.
On 5-year performance, UGA leads with 22.69% vs 7.11% for EMXF. On fees, EMXF is cheaper at 0.16% per year. On volatility, UGA has been the lower-risk option at 9.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, UGA has performed better with a 22.69% return vs 7.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EMXF is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UGA.
EMXF has the higher dividend yield at 2.67%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.
EMXF is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while UGA is Oil & Gas. EMXF tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Choice ESG Screened 5% Issuer Capped Index, while UGA tracks Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for EMXF and 0.75% for UGA.
EMXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for EMXF and UGA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer