EMXF vs. QEMM

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

EMXF (iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF) and QEMM (SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - EMXF tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Choice ESG Screened 5% Issuer Capped Index while QEMM tracks the MSCI EM Factor Mix A-Series (USD). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, EMXF returned 7.11%/yr vs 7.03%/yr for QEMM. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. EMXF charges 0.16%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for QEMM.

Performance

EMXF vs. QEMM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF (EMXF) and SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF (QEMM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMXF achieves a 24.26% return, which is significantly higher than QEMM's 21.11% return.

EMXF

• 1D: -4.12%
• 1M: 5.10%
• YTD: 24.26%
• 6M: 24.79%
• 1Y: 43.07%
• 3Y*: 21.44%
• 5Y*: 7.11%
• 10Y*: —

QEMM

• 1D: -3.77%
• 1M: 1.15%
• YTD: 21.11%
• 6M: 21.59%
• 1Y: 35.60%
• 3Y*: 18.42%
• 5Y*: 7.03%
• 10Y*: 8.86%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMXF vs. QEMM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
EMXF iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF	24.26%	29.40%	8.03%	6.63%	-18.99%	4.45%	15.65%
QEMM SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF	21.11%	21.92%	4.98%	12.50%	-17.82%	6.34%	12.77%

Correlation

The correlation between EMXF and QEMM is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2020	0.85

The correlation between EMXF and QEMM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

EMXF vs. QEMM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	EMXF	QEMM
Financial Services	34.3%	13.1%
Technology	33.4%	25.2%
Communication Services	8.5%	2.4%
Industrials	5.6%	1.8%
Consumer Cyclical	5.2%	4.8%
Healthcare	3.6%	0.9%
Basic Materials	2.8%	3.0%
Consumer Defensive	2.6%	2.1%
Real Estate	1.4%	0.6%
Utilities	0.6%	1.5%
Energy	0.0%	2.4%

Return for Risk

EMXF vs. QEMM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMXF

EMXF Risk / Return Rank: 71
EMXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
EMXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
EMXF Omega Ratio Rank: 73
EMXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
EMXF Martin Ratio Rank: 74

QEMM

QEMM Risk / Return Rank: 66
QEMM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 63
QEMM Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
QEMM Omega Ratio Rank: 67
QEMM Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
QEMM Martin Ratio Rank: 70

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMXF vs. QEMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF (EMXF) and SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF (QEMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	EMXF	QEMM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.13	1.94	+0.19
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.82	2.57	+0.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.37	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.45	3.44	+0.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.92	12.14	+0.78

EMXF vs. QEMM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMXF Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the QEMM Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMXF and QEMM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

EMXF vs. QEMM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMXF drawdown since its inception was -33.13%, smaller than the maximum QEMM drawdown of -36.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMXF and QEMM.

Drawdown Indicators

	EMXF	QEMM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.13%	-36.89%	+3.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.53%	-10.40%	-2.13%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.93%	-17.03%	+1.10%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-32.89%	-27.19%	-5.70%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-36.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.12%	-4.06%	-0.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.93%	-10.60%	-1.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.34%	2.94%	+0.40%

Volatility

EMXF vs. QEMM - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF (EMXF) has a higher volatility of 10.32% compared to SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF (QEMM) at 9.31%. This indicates that EMXF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QEMM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	EMXF	QEMM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.32%	9.31%	+1.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.35%	16.80%	+1.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.37%	18.46%	+1.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.50%	15.64%	+6.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.99%	16.98%	+5.01%

EMXF vs. QEMM - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMXF has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than QEMM's 0.30% expense ratio.

Dividends

EMXF vs. QEMM - Dividend Comparison

EMXF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.67%, less than QEMM's 4.46% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
EMXF iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF	2.67%	3.43%	2.92%	2.25%	2.42%	1.87%	0.41%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QEMM SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets StrategicFactors ETF	4.46%	4.90%	5.17%	4.88%	4.07%	2.35%	2.48%	3.05%	2.86%	2.11%	2.03%	2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both EMXF and QEMM in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, EMXF and QEMM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, EMXF or QEMM?

EMXF has higher volatility (10.32%) compared to QEMM (9.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMXF dropped -33.13% vs QEMM's -36.89%.

Which ETF is better, EMXF or QEMM?

On 5-year performance, EMXF leads with 7.11% vs 7.03% for QEMM. On fees, EMXF is cheaper at 0.16% per year. On volatility, QEMM has been the lower-risk option at 9.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, EMXF or QEMM?

Over the 5-year period, EMXF has performed better with a 7.11% return vs 7.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, EMXF or QEMM?

EMXF is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for QEMM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, EMXF or QEMM?

QEMM has the higher dividend yield at 4.46%, compared with 2.67% for EMXF.

What is the main difference between EMXF and QEMM?

EMXF tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Choice ESG Screened 5% Issuer Capped Index, while QEMM tracks MSCI EM Factor Mix A-Series (USD). They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for EMXF and 0.30% for QEMM.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

EMXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.