PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
EMXF vs. EMIF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

EMXF vs. EMIF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF (EMXF) and iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF (EMIF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, EMXF achieves a 24.76% return, which is significantly higher than EMIF's 1.74% return.


EMXF

1D
-1.30%
1M
8.70%
YTD
24.76%
6M
27.57%
1Y
47.21%
3Y*
21.67%
5Y*
7.15%
10Y*

EMIF

1D
-1.54%
1M
-6.56%
YTD
1.74%
6M
0.79%
1Y
21.17%
3Y*
11.48%
5Y*
4.93%
10Y*
2.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

EMXF vs. EMIF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
EMXF
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF
24.76%29.40%8.03%6.63%-18.99%4.45%15.32%
EMIF
iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF
1.74%33.90%1.21%5.67%-12.59%3.76%18.26%

Correlation

The correlation between EMXF and EMIF is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.58

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020

0.58

The correlation between EMXF and EMIF has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.58 to 0.62 - a consistent structural relationship.

EMXF vs. EMIF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
EMXF
EMIF

Technology

35.2%

-

Financial Services

32.2%

-

Communication Services

8.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

5.7%

-

Industrials

5.5%
41.1%

Healthcare

4.2%

-

Consumer Defensive

2.9%

-

Basic Materials

2.6%

-

Real Estate

1.7%

-

Utilities

0.6%
40.1%

Energy

0.0%
18.8%

Technology

EMXF
35.2%
EMIF

-

Financial Services

EMXF
32.2%
EMIF

-

Communication Services

EMXF
8.0%
EMIF

-

Consumer Cyclical

EMXF
5.7%
EMIF

-

Industrials

EMXF
5.5%
EMIF
41.1%

Healthcare

EMXF
4.2%
EMIF

-

Consumer Defensive

EMXF
2.9%
EMIF

-

Basic Materials

EMXF
2.6%
EMIF

-

Real Estate

EMXF
1.7%
EMIF

-

Utilities

EMXF
0.6%
EMIF
40.1%

Energy

EMXF
0.0%
EMIF
18.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

EMXF vs. EMIF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMXF
EMXF Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
EMXF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMXF Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMXF Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
EMXF Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMXF Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

EMIF
EMIF Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
EMIF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMIF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMIF Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
EMIF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMIF Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

EMXF vs. EMIF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF (EMXF) and iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF (EMIF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


EMXFEMIFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.26

+0.21

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.79

1.71

+2.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.56

4.92

+9.63

EMXF vs. EMIF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current EMXF Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is higher than the EMIF Sharpe Ratio of 1.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of EMXF and EMIF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


EMXFEMIFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.55

1.38

+1.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.25

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.17

+0.34

Drawdowns

EMXF vs. EMIF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum EMXF drawdown since its inception was -33.13%, smaller than the maximum EMIF drawdown of -48.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for EMXF and EMIF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


EMXFEMIFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.13%

-48.02%

+14.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.53%

-12.45%

-0.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.93%

-16.70%

+0.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.89%

-23.68%

-9.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.30%

-12.45%

+11.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.02%

-15.91%

+3.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.25%

4.31%

-1.06%

Volatility

EMXF vs. EMIF - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF (EMXF) has a higher volatility of 8.10% compared to iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF (EMIF) at 4.38%. This indicates that EMXF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMIF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


EMXFEMIFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.10%

4.38%

+3.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.13%

12.97%

+3.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.60%

15.41%

+3.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.15%

19.67%

+2.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.77%

20.61%

+1.16%

EMXF vs. EMIF - Expense Ratio Comparison

EMXF has a 0.16% expense ratio, which is lower than EMIF's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

EMXF vs. EMIF - Dividend Comparison

EMXF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.75%, less than EMIF's 4.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMIF
iShares Emerging Markets Infrastructure ETF
4.87%4.96%4.12%2.64%3.08%3.94%2.54%2.07%2.64%2.58%3.16%2.07%
EMXF
iShares ESG Advanced MSCI EM ETF
2.75%3.43%2.92%2.25%2.42%1.87%0.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


EMXF and EMIF have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EMXF has higher volatility (8.10%) compared to EMIF (4.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, EMXF dropped -33.13% vs EMIF's -48.02%.

On 5-year performance, EMXF leads with 7.15% vs 4.93% for EMIF. On fees, EMXF is cheaper at 0.16% per year. On volatility, EMIF has been the lower-risk option at 4.38%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, EMXF has performed better with a 7.15% return vs 4.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EMXF is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for EMIF.

EMIF has the higher dividend yield at 4.87%, compared with 2.75% for EMXF.

EMXF tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Choice ESG Screened 5% Issuer Capped Index, while EMIF tracks S&P Emerging Markets Infrastructure Index. Their fees differ too: 0.16% for EMXF and 0.75% for EMIF.

EMXF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for EMXF and EMIF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer